Literature DB >> 14130091

FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN THE PIGEON.

V GRAF, D H BULLOCK, M E BITTERMAN.   

Abstract

In a discrete-trials, two-key choice situation, probability-learning by pigeons was studied under a variety of training conditions. Matching was found in simultaneous and in successive problems, but a spatial problem produced only maximizing. In the simultaneous problem, noncorrection produced maximizing, while correction produced matching. Guidance produced maximizing when the animals were required to earn each opportunity for choice by pecking a center key on FR-5, but matching when the center key was not used. In a discrete-trials one-key situation, with latency as the measure, frequency and probability of reinforcement were varied independently. Differences in probability produced differences in latency of response, but differences in frequency did not.

Keywords:  BIRDS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EXPERIMENTAL LAB STUDY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY)

Mesh:

Year:  1964        PMID: 14130091      PMCID: PMC1404312          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Probability-matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D H BULLOCK; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1962-12

2.  Some observations concerning prepotency and probability of postponing shock with a two-lever avoidance procedure.

Authors:  T VERHAVE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response probability in a two-choice learning situation with varying probability of reinforcement.

Authors:  R H HICKSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-08

4.  Some comparative psychology.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN; J WODINSKY; D K CANDLAND
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-03

5.  Techniques of housing and maintaining a large pigeon colony.

Authors:  D H Bullock; W A Roberts; M E Bitterman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  18 in total

1.  Effect of experimental analogs of contingency management treatment on cocaine seeking behavior.

Authors:  Mark K Greenwald; David M Ledgerwood; Leslie H Lundahl; Caren L Steinmiller
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Modeling unidimensional categorization in monkeys.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Roger Ratcliff; Anil Cherian; Mark Segraves
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Molecular contingencies: reinforcement probability.

Authors:  J M Hale; C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement of least-frequent sequences of choices.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Probability learning as a function of momentary reinforcement probability.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Contingency spaces and measures in classical and instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  J Gibbon; R Berryman; R L Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.