Literature DB >> 3998112

Comparison of a simple latex agglutination test with hemolysis-in-gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay for detection of rubella virus antibodies.

P Väänänen, V M Häivä, P Koskela, O Meurman.   

Abstract

Rubella virus antibodies were measured in 300 sera from pregnant women visiting a maternity center by using a new, simple latex test, Rubalex. The results were compared with those obtained by using hemolysis in gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay. The sensitivity of the latex test was 100, 98.0, and 99.6% when compared with hemolysis in gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay, respectively. Its comparative specificity was 96.2, 95.7, and 90.7%, and the predictive value of a positive result was 99.2, 99.2, and 98%, respectively. When assayed with the British standard anti-rubella serum its sensitivity was 11 IU/ml. The latex test gave a positive result within 2 min, and 87% of the positive samples had already reacted after 1 min. The negative results remained as such for at least 8 min. No prozone effect was observed for sera with hemagglutination inhibition titers from 256 to 2,048. We concluded that the latex test, Rubalex, was readily applicable for measuring rubella immunity with a reaction time of 2 min in undiluted samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3998112      PMCID: PMC271783          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.793-795.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  The British Standard for anti-rubella serum.

Authors:  M Clarke; J A Dudgeon; R Ferris; G Colinet; H Tate; F T Perkins
Journal:  J Biol Stand       Date:  1975

2.  Hemolysis-in-gel test for the demonstration of antibodies to rubella virus.

Authors:  O Strannegård; L Grillner; I M Lindberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  False positive rubella virus haemagglutination inhibition reactions: occurrence and disclosure.

Authors:  G Haukenes; H Blom
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Radioimmunoassay in diagnostic virology.

Authors:  P Halonen; O Meurman
Journal:  Lab Res Methods Biol Med       Date:  1982

5.  Evaluation of a latex agglutination test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus in selected sera.

Authors:  S Freeman; L Clark; N Dumas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of commercially available diagnostic test kits for rubella.

Authors:  G A Castellano; D L Madden; G T Hazzard; C S Cleghorn; D V Vails; A C Ley; N R Tzan; J L Sever
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Comparison of the latex agglutination test with the hemagglutination inhibition test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and neutralization test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus.

Authors:  J M Meegan; B K Evans; D M Horstmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rubella hemagglutinin prepared with alkaline extraction of virus grown in suspension culture of BHK-21 cells.

Authors:  P E Halonen; J M Ryan; J A Stewart
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1967-05

9.  Rapid latex agglutination test for rubella antibody.

Authors:  J L Sever; N R Tzan; I C Shekarchi; D L Madden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Fluorescence immunoassay and passive latex agglutination as alternatives to hemagglutination inhibition for determining rubella immune status.

Authors:  S L Fayram; A Nakasone; S Aarnaes; M Zartarian; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  9 in total

1.  Latex enzyme immunoassay for measuring IgG antibodies to rubella virus.

Authors:  G Duverlie; C Roussel; M Driencourt; J Orfila
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Rapid dot enzyme immunoassay for the detection of antibodies to cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  T M Lin; S P Halbert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Differences in antibody responses with rapid agglutination tests for the detection of rubella antibodies.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D J DeLong; J B Mahony; S Castriciano
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Use of rubella virus E1 fusion proteins for detection of rubella virus antibodies.

Authors:  W G Starkey; J Newcombe; K M Corbett; K M Liu; P G Sanders; J M Best
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of a latex agglutination test in the diagnosis of rubella infection.

Authors:  O Meurman; C Granberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies with a baculovirus-expressed E1 protein.

Authors:  M Schmidt; C Lindqvist; A Salmi; C Oker-Blom
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1996-03

7.  Comparison of a new, rapid enzyme immunoassay with a latex agglutination test for qualitative detection of rubella antibodies.

Authors:  M J Ferraro; W M Kallas; K P Welch; A Y Lau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of microparticle enzyme immunoassays for immunoglobulins G and M to rubella virus and Toxoplasma gondii on the Abbott IMx automated analyzer.

Authors:  L E Schaefer; J W Dyke; F D Meglio; P R Murray; W Crafts; A C Niles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of five methods for the determination of rubella immunity.

Authors:  R L Sautter; A E Crist; L M Johnson; W D Lebar
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.