Literature DB >> 3308952

Comparison of a new, rapid enzyme immunoassay with a latex agglutination test for qualitative detection of rubella antibodies.

M J Ferraro1, W M Kallas, K P Welch, A Y Lau.   

Abstract

A total of 450 sera were tested for rubella virus antibodies by using a new, rapid enzyme immunoassay, SUDS Rubella. The results were compared with those obtained by using the Rubascan test, a well-established latex agglutination method. The sensitivity of the SUDS Rubella was 99.5%, and the specificity was 100%, when compared with Rubascan. The SUDS Rubella test can be performed in 10 min and provides an accurate screening test for the detection of rubella antibodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3308952      PMCID: PMC269315          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.9.1722-1724.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  False positive rubella virus haemagglutination inhibition reactions: occurrence and disclosure.

Authors:  G Haukenes; H Blom
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Differences in antibody responses with rapid agglutination tests for the detection of rubella antibodies.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D J DeLong; J B Mahony; S Castriciano
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Latex agglutination test for rubella antibodies: report based on data from the College of American Pathologists surveys, 1983 to 1985.

Authors:  L P Skendzel; D C Edson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of the performance and reproducibility of various serological methods and diagnostic kits for the detection of rubella antibodies.

Authors:  G Enders; F Knotek
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.014

5.  Comparative evaluation of commercial rubella virus antibody kits.

Authors:  R A Wittenburg; M A Roberts; L B Elliott; L M Little
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Latex-agglutination test for rubella antibody: validity of positive results assessed by response to immunization and comparison with other tests.

Authors:  G A Storch; N Myers
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Determination of immune status in patients with low antibody titers for rubella virus.

Authors:  S L Fayram; S Akin; S L Aarnaes; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Variables of the rubella hemagglutination-inhibition test system and their effect on antigen and antibody titers.

Authors:  N J Schmidt; E H Lennette
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-03

9.  Rubella antibodies detected by several commercial immunoassays in hemagglutination inhibition-negative sera.

Authors:  K T Kleeman; D J Kiefer; S P Halbert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of a simple latex agglutination test with hemolysis-in-gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay for detection of rubella virus antibodies.

Authors:  P Väänänen; V M Häivä; P Koskela; O Meurman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Microparticle enzyme immunoassay for determination of immunoglobulin G antibodies to human cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  G Duverlie; C Roussel; M Driencourt; J Orfila
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Clinical laboratory applications of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  W J Payne; D L Marshall; R K Shockley; W J Martin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 26.132

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.