Literature DB >> 2212070

Latex enzyme immunoassay for measuring IgG antibodies to rubella virus.

G Duverlie1, C Roussel, M Driencourt, J Orfila.   

Abstract

A latex enzyme immunoassay (LEIA) for detecting IgG class antibody to rubella virus was compared with the latex agglutination test (LA) and a haemagglutination inhibition assay (HI). Of 243 sera tested, four discrepant results were observed among all three techniques, corresponding to borderline values. Except for one sample containing specific IgM class antibody, the difference between quantitative results from each pair of tests was always within a value corresponding to two doubling dilutions and was considered to have acceptable variation. The LEIA technique allowed 10 seroconversions to be detected, as determined by the other techniques. The LEIA required a single 1 in 8 sample dilution, took 30 minutes, and provided a useful alternative assay for the quantitation of rubella antibodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2212070      PMCID: PMC502758          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.43.9.766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new latex test and a new enzyme immunoassay for determination of rubella immunity.

Authors:  A E Simor; R Chua; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Microparticle enzyme immunoassay for determination of immunoglobulin G antibodies to human cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  G Duverlie; C Roussel; M Driencourt; J Orfila
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Direct agglutination test and other assays for measuring antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  J Johnson; K Duffy; L New; R E Holliman; B S Chessum; D G Fleck
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of the performance and reproducibility of various serological methods and diagnostic kits for the detection of rubella antibodies.

Authors:  G Enders; F Knotek
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.014

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Evaluation of commercially available diagnostic test kits for rubella.

Authors:  G A Castellano; D L Madden; G T Hazzard; C S Cleghorn; D V Vails; A C Ley; N R Tzan; J L Sever
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Comparison of the latex agglutination test with the hemagglutination inhibition test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and neutralization test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus.

Authors:  J M Meegan; B K Evans; D M Horstmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Measurement of variation and significance in serologic tests.

Authors:  R N Taylor
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Standardization of techniques and reagents for the study of rubella antibody.

Authors:  M Forsgren
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr

10.  Comparison of a simple latex agglutination test with hemolysis-in-gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay for detection of rubella virus antibodies.

Authors:  P Väänänen; V M Häivä; P Koskela; O Meurman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of comparison between laboratory methods.

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.