Literature DB >> 3973234

Spectral sharpness and vowel dissimilarity.

T M van Veen, T Houtgast.   

Abstract

The effect of sharpening or smoothing the spectral envelopes of synthetic vowel-like sounds on the dissimilarities perceived among these sounds was investigated by means of triadic comparisons. When a spectral envelope (dB on a log-frequency scale) is considered the sum of a series of sinusoidal spectral modulations (or ripples) of different densities (the ripple spectrum), spectral sharpening or smoothing can be described as an amplification or attenuation of a part of the original ripple spectrum. For a set of nine sounds comprising different degrees of spectral sharpening of a single vowel, the perceived dissimilarities were found to be dominated by a specific part of the ripple spectrum, i.e., by spectral modulations with a density of about 2 ripples/oct. The possible role of lateral suppression in relation to this dominant region is discussed. For a set of 18 sounds comprising six vowels, each in three different versions (sharpened, normal, or smoothed), the dissimilarities were found to be determined mainly by the global shape of the spectral envelopes, i.e., by spectral modulations up to about 1.5-2 ripples/oct. Details of the spectral envelope (including the region of 2 ripples/oct where lateral suppression is effective) appear to be of minor influence on vowel dissimilarities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3973234     DOI: 10.1121/1.391880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Naturalistic auditory contrast improves spectrotemporal coding in the cat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Monty A Escabí; Lee M Miller; Heather L Read; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Precise feature based time scales and frequency decorrelation lead to a sparse auditory code.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectral integration plasticity in cat auditory cortex induced by perceptual training.

Authors:  M Diane Keeling; Barbara M Calhoun; Katharina Krüger; Daniel B Polley; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of spectral modulation filtering on vowel identification.

Authors:  Chang Liu; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  How Do Age and Hearing Loss Impact Spectral Envelope Perception?

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Distribution of spectral modulation transfer functions in a young, normal-hearing population.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.

Authors:  Sittiprapa Isarangura; Ann C Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Spectral and temporal modulation tradeoff in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Francisco A Rodríguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Spectrotemporal sound preferences of neighboring inferior colliculus neurons: implications for local circuitry and processing.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Francisco C Rodriguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.