Literature DB >> 19045661

Effects of spectral modulation filtering on vowel identification.

Chang Liu1, David A Eddins.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to measure the effects of global spectral manipulations on vowel identification by progressively high-pass filtering vowel stimuli in the spectral modulation domain. Twelve American-English vowels, naturally spoken by a female talker, were subjected to varied degrees of high-pass filtering in the spectral modulation domain, with cutoff frequencies of 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 cycles/octave. Identification performance for vowels presented at 70 dB sound pressure level with and without spectral modulation filtering was measured for five normal-hearing listeners. Results indicated that vowel identification performance was progressively degraded as the spectral modulation cutoff frequency increased. Degradation of vowel identification was greater for back vowels than for front or central vowels. Detailed acoustic analyses indicated that spectral modulation filtering resulted in a more crowded vowel space (F1xF2), reduced spectral contrast, and reduced spectral tilt relative to the original unfiltered vowels. Changes in the global spectral features produced by spectral modulation filtering were associated with substantial reduction in vowel identification. The results indicated that the spectral cues critical for vowel identification were represented by spectral modulation frequencies below 2 cycles/octave. These results are considered in terms of the interactions among spectral shape perception, spectral smearing, and speech perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045661      PMCID: PMC2676619          DOI: 10.1121/1.2956468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  On the effectiveness of whole spectral shape for vowel perception.

Authors:  M Ito; J Tsuchida; M Yano
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of spectral modulation cues in virtual sound localization.

Authors:  Jinyu Qian; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

5.  Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude.

Authors:  Q Summerfield; A Sidwell; T Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels.

Authors:  A K Syrdal; H S Gopal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spectral sharpness and vowel dissimilarity.

Authors:  T M van Veen; T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Modeling the judgment of vowel quality differences.

Authors:  R A Bladon; B Lindblom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  M R Leek; M F Dorman; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Vision perceptually restores auditory spectral dynamics in speech.

Authors:  John Plass; David Brang; Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How Do Age and Hearing Loss Impact Spectral Envelope Perception?

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; Andrew J Oxenham; Peggy B Nelson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Distribution of spectral modulation transfer functions in a young, normal-hearing population.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Monty Escabí; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Distortion of Spectral Ripples Through Cochlear Implants Has Major Implications for Interpreting Performance Scores.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Gabrielle O'Brien
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Golbarg Mehraei; Shihab Shamma; Frederick J Gallun; Sarah M Theodoroff; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth.

Authors:  Emily Buss; John Grose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.