Literature DB >> 22723685

Precise feature based time scales and frequency decorrelation lead to a sparse auditory code.

Chen Chen1, Heather L Read, Monty A Escabí.   

Abstract

Sparse redundancy reducing codes have been proposed as efficient strategies for representing sensory stimuli. A prevailing hypothesis suggests that sensory representations shift from dense redundant codes in the periphery to selective sparse codes in cortex. We propose an alternative framework where sparseness and redundancy depend on sensory integration time scales and demonstrate that the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) of cats encodes sound features by precise sparse spike trains. Direct comparisons with auditory cortical neurons demonstrate that ICC responses were sparse and uncorrelated as long as the spike train time scales were matched to the sensory integration time scales relevant to ICC neurons. Intriguingly, correlated spiking in the ICC was substantially lower than predicted by linear or nonlinear models and strictly observed for neurons with best frequencies within a "critical band," the hallmark of perceptual frequency resolution in mammals. This is consistent with a sparse asynchronous code throughout much of the ICC and a complementary correlation code within a critical band that may allow grouping of perceptually relevant cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22723685      PMCID: PMC3483313          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6506-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

1.  Spectrotemporal receptive fields in the lemniscal auditory thalamus and cortex.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Natural stimulation of the nonclassical receptive field increases information transmission efficiency in V1.

Authors:  William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Characterizing the sparseness of neural codes.

Authors:  B Willmore; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.273

Review 4.  Redundancy reduction revisited.

Authors:  H Barlow
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.273

5.  Nonlinear spectrotemporal sound analysis by neurons in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Monty A Escabi; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Gabor analysis of auditory midbrain receptive fields: spectro-temporal and binaural composition.

Authors:  Anqi Qiu; Christoph E Schreiner; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Coding of natural scenes in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Michael Weliky; József Fiser; Ruskin H Hunt; David N Wagner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Roles of inhibition for transforming binaural properties in the brainstem auditory system.

Authors:  George D Pollak; R Michael Burger; Thomas J Park; Achim Klug; Eric E Bauer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Modulation spectra of natural sounds and ethological theories of auditory processing.

Authors:  Nandini C Singh; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  K Sen; F E Theunissen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Functional organization of the mammalian auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Munenori Ono; Tetsufumi Ito
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Neural spike-timing patterns vary with sound shape and periodicity in three auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  Christopher M Lee; Ahmad F Osman; Maxim Volgushev; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cortical inhibition reduces information redundancy at presentation of communication sounds in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Quentin Gaucher; Chloé Huetz; Boris Gourévitch; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural integration and enhancement from the inferior colliculus up to different layers of auditory cortex.

Authors:  Malgorzata M Straka; Dillon Schendel; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Auditory cortical local subnetworks are characterized by sharply synchronous activity.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Independent population coding of speech with sub-millisecond precision.

Authors:  Jose A Garcia-Lazaro; Lucile A C Belliveau; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A Hierarchy of Time Scales for Discriminating and Classifying the Temporal Shape of Sound in Three Auditory Cortical Fields.

Authors:  Ahmad F Osman; Christopher M Lee; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Rodent auditory perception: Critical band limitations and plasticity.

Authors:  J King; M Insanally; M Jin; A R O Martins; J A D'amour; R C Froemke
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Distinct neural ensemble response statistics are associated with recognition and discrimination of natural sound textures.

Authors:  Xiu Zhai; Fatemeh Khatami; Mina Sadeghi; Fengrong He; Heather L Read; Ian H Stevenson; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cortical speech-evoked response patterns in multiple auditory fields are correlated with behavioral discrimination ability.

Authors:  T M Centanni; C T Engineer; M P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.