Literature DB >> 31638883

The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.

Sittiprapa Isarangura1, Ann C Eddins1, Erol J Ozmeral1, David A Eddins1.   

Abstract

Purpose Spectral modulation detection is an increasingly common assay of suprathreshold auditory perception and has been correlated with speech perception performance. Here, the potential effects of stimulus duration and stimulus presentation level on spectral modulation detection were investigated. Method Spectral modulation detection thresholds were measured as a function of modulation frequency in young, normal-hearing listeners. The standard stimulus was a bandpass noise, and signal stimuli were created by superimposing sinusoidal spectral modulation on the bandpass noise carrier. The modulation was sinusoidal on a log2 frequency axis and a log10 (dB) amplitude scale with a random starting phase (0-2π radians). In 1 experiment, stimulus durations were 50, 100, 200, or 400 ms (at fixed level 81 dB SPL). In a 2nd experiment, stimuli were presented at sensation levels of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 60 dB SL (fixed at a duration of 400 ms). Results Spectral modulation detection thresholds were similarly low for the 400- and 200-ms durations, increased slightly for the 100-ms duration, and increased markedly for the 50-ms duration. Thresholds were lowest for 40 dB SL; increased slightly for 20, 30, and 60 dB SL; and markedly higher for the 10-dB SL condition. Conclusions The increase in thresholds for the shortest durations and lowest sensational levels is consistent with previous investigations of auditory spectral profile analysis. The effects of presentation level and stimulus duration are important considerations in the context of understanding potential relationships between the perception of spectral cues and speech perception, when designing investigations and interpreting data related to spectral envelope perception, and in the context of models of auditory perception. As examples, 2 simple models based on auditory nerve output that have been used to explain spectrotemporal modulation in previous investigations produced an output inconsistent with the present results. Plain language summary Intensity variations across audio frequency lead to spectral shapes that are essential and sometimes signature features of various sounds in the environment, including speech. Here, we show how laboratory measures of spectral shape perception depend on presentation level and stimulus duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31638883      PMCID: PMC7838824          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  26 in total

1.  Spectral modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency, carrier bandwidth, and carrier frequency region.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Eva M Bero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of spectral modulation cues in virtual sound localization.

Authors:  Jinyu Qian; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Aniket A Saoji; Leonid Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of presentation level on spectrotemporal modulation detection.

Authors:  Sara Magits; Arturo Moncada-Torres; Lieselot Van Deun; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen; Tom Francart
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Updated parameters and expanded simulation options for a model of the auditory periphery.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Level discrimination of tones as a function of duration.

Authors:  M Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Discrimination of spectral shape as a function of stimulus duration.

Authors:  H Dai; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Signal and masker uncertainty with noise maskers of varying duration, bandwidth, and center frequency.

Authors:  M F Spiegel; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Golbarg Mehraei; Shihab Shamma; Frederick J Gallun; Sarah M Theodoroff; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  4 in total

1.  Relating Suprathreshold Auditory Processing Abilities to Speech Understanding in Competition.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Laura Coco; Tess K Koerner; E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Michelle R Molis; David A Eddins; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds as Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.245

3.  Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Ryan W McCreery; Benjamin J Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Remote auditory assessment using Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) and participant-owned devices.

Authors:  E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Trevor Stavropoulos; Audrey Anna Carrillo; Sierra Cheung; Yue J He; David A Eddins; Michelle R Molis; Frederick J Gallun; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.