Literature DB >> 26520329

Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality.

James M Kates1, Kathryn H Arehart1.   

Abstract

This paper uses mutual information to quantify the relationship between envelope modulation fidelity and perceptual responses. Data from several previous experiments that measured speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality are evaluated for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. A model of the auditory periphery is used to generate envelope signals, and envelope modulation fidelity is calculated using the normalized cross-covariance of the degraded signal envelope with that of a reference signal. Two procedures are used to describe the envelope modulation: (1) modulation within each auditory frequency band and (2) spectro-temporal processing that analyzes the modulation of spectral ripple components fit to successive short-time spectra. The results indicate that low modulation rates provide the highest information for intelligibility, while high modulation rates provide the highest information for speech and music quality. The low-to-mid auditory frequencies are most important for intelligibility, while mid frequencies are most important for speech quality and high frequencies are most important for music quality. Differences between the spectral ripple components used for the spectro-temporal analysis were not significant in five of the six experimental conditions evaluated. The results indicate that different modulation-rate and auditory-frequency weights may be appropriate for indices designed to predict different types of perceptual relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26520329      PMCID: PMC4627935          DOI: 10.1121/1.4931899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Pitch is determined by naturally occurring periodic sounds.

Authors:  David A Schwartz; Dale Purves
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.

Authors:  Ulrik Kjems; Jesper B Boldt; Michael S Pedersen; Thomas Lunner; Deliang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; James M Kates; Melinda C Anderson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.

Authors:  Søren Jørgensen; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.

Authors:  Naomi B H Croghan; Kathryn H Arehart; James M Kates
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI).

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2015-12-10

2.  Speech Intelligibility Prediction using Spectro-Temporal Modulation Analysis.

Authors:  Amin Edraki; Wai-Yip Chan; Jesper Jensen; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2020-11-24

3.  The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Emily M H Lundberg; Song Hui Chon; James M Kates; Melinda C Anderson; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.297

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.