Literature DB >> 3831918

Limitations of context conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w].

P C Shinn, S E Blumstein, A Jongman.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1985        PMID： 3831918     DOI： 10.3758/bf03207170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  19 in total

1.  Acoustic characteristics of English /w,r,l/ spoken correctly by young children and adults.

Authors:  R M Dalston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts.

Authors:  S M Abel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; T D Carrell; S J Gans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-10

6.  Studies on the categorization of speech by infants.

Authors:  J L Miller; P D Eimas
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-03

7.  Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements.

Authors:  T Gay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The role of second formant transitions in the stop-semivowel distinction.

Authors:  E C Schwab; J R Sawusch; H C Nusbaum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-02

9.  Contextual effects in infant speech perception.

Authors:  P D Eimas; J L Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Some effects of speaking rate on phonetic perception.

Authors:  J L Miller
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.759
View more
  12 in total

1.  Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Eric Tarr; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; D Bradley Welling; Antoine J Shahin; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Cue-integration and context effects in speech: evidence against speaking-rate normalization.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: effects of temporal distance.

Authors:  R S Newman; J R Sawusch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-05

4.  Induction of rate-dependent processing by coarse-grained aspects of speech.

Authors:  P C Gordon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

5.  The time-course of speaking rate compensation: Effects of sentential rate and vowel length on voicing judgments.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Limits on the limitations of context-conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w].

Authors:  J L Miller; S C Wayland
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

7.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Cue integration with categories: Weighting acoustic cues in speech using unsupervised learning and distributional statistics.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-04

9.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

10.  Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus; Michael J Spivey; Dana Subik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.