Literature DB >> 19045996

Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.

Bob McMurray1, Richard N Aslin, Michael K Tanenhaus, Michael J Spivey, Dana Subik.   

Abstract

Five experiments monitored eye movements in phoneme and lexical identification tasks to examine the effect of within-category subphonetic variation on the perception of stop consonants. Experiment 1 demonstrated gradient effects along voice-onset time (VOT) continua made from natural speech, replicating results with synthetic speech (B. McMurray, M. K. Tanenhaus, & R. N. Aslin, 2002). Experiments 2-5 used synthetic VOT continua to examine effects of response alternatives (2 vs. 4), task (lexical vs. phoneme decision), and type of token (word vs. consonant-vowel). A gradient effect of VOT in at least one half of the continuum was observed in all conditions. These results suggest that during online spoken word recognition, lexical competitors are activated in proportion to their continuous distance from a category boundary. This gradient processing may allow listeners to anticipate upcoming acoustic-phonetic information in the speech signal and dynamically compensate for acoustic variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045996      PMCID: PMC3011988          DOI: 10.1037/a0011747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  55 in total

1.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Delphine Dahan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-06

2.  Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface: evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Michael J Spivey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-01

3.  Modeling phoneme perception. I: Categorical perception.

Authors:  M E Schouten; A J van Hessen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

5.  Lexical effects on phonetic categorization: the role of stimulus naturalness and stimulus quality.

Authors:  M W Burton; S E Blumstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Role of articulation in speech perception: clues from production.

Authors:  B Lindblom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1973-06-01

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Phonetic prototypes.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

10.  Perception of synthetic nasal consonants in initial and final syllable position.

Authors:  L S Larkey; J Wald; W Strange
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-04
View more
  37 in total

1.  Continuous dynamics of color categorization.

Authors:  Stephanie Huette; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

2.  Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Matthew B Winn; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Cue-integration and context effects in speech: evidence against speaking-rate normalization.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Context effects on musical chord categorization: Different forms of top-down feedback in speech and music?

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Joel L Dennhardt; Andrew Struck-Marcell
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-07

8.  Speech categorization develops slowly through adolescence.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ani Danelz; Hannah Rigler; Michael Seedorff
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-06-28

9.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

10.  Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning.

Authors:  Gwyneth C Rost; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.