Literature DB >> 3140270

Malpractice premiums and primary cesarean section rates in New York and Illinois.

S M Rock1.   

Abstract

The fear of malpractice liability is mentioned frequently as a cause of increased cesarean section rates, but without quantitative investigations. This perception may be studied at an aggregate level by comparing malpractice insurance premiums, a proxy for liability risk, with primary cesarean section rates. Both New York and Illinois are divided into territories for insurance rates; the premium was uniform within each territory over the period studied for each specialty. Premiums for obstetricians were linked to birth and procedure data from New York and Illinois hospitals for 1981 and 1983, respectively, to determine whether there was a correlation between premium levels and the primary cesarean section rate. A statistically significant difference was found between mean cesarean rates by insurance premium territories in each State. A correlation was observed between increased insurance rates among territories and increased cesarean section rates. Based on these results, a substantial impact was found on delivery decisions resulting from the fear of malpractice suits.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3140270      PMCID: PMC1478121     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  8 in total

1.  Medical malpractice problem.

Authors:  C P Hall
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  1979

2.  Cesarean section in present-day obstetrics. Presidential address.

Authors:  O H Jones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Cesarean rate increases in 1985.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel; M Moien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States.

Authors:  P H Shiono; J G Fielden; D McNellis; G G Rhoads; W H Pearse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987 Jan 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980.

Authors:  N Gleicher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Complications in cesarean and non-cesarean deliveries: United States, 1980.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to cesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980.

Authors:  P J Placek; K G Keppel; S M Taffel; T L Liss
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Cesarean section in California--1960 through 1975.

Authors:  D Petitti; R O Olson; R L Williams
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-02-15       Impact factor: 8.661

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.

Authors:  W J Hueston; S Lewis-Stevenson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-02

2.  Attitudes of Obstetricians toward Cesarean Delivery in Challenging Cases.

Authors:  Sareh Samadi; Naeimeh Gholizadeh; Nasrin Shoar; Saeed Shoar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-05-15

3.  The Effects of Malpractice Non-Economic Damage Caps on the Supply of Physician Labor: Heterogeneity by Physician Age and Risk.

Authors:  Michael F Pesko; Meagan Cea; Jayme Mendelsohn; Tara F Bishop
Journal:  Int Rev Law Econ       Date:  2017-03-21

4.  Racial and ethnic differences in indication for primary cesarean delivery at term: experience at one U.S. Institution.

Authors:  Sierra Washington; Aaron B Caughey; Yvonne W Cheng; Allison S Bryant
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Y Tony Yang; Michelle M Mello; S V Subramanian; David M Studdert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Evaluating the medical malpractice system and options for reform.

Authors:  Daniel P Kessler
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2011

7.  State medical malpractice laws and utilization of surgical treatment for rotator cuff tear and proximal humerus fracture: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Brian Chen; Cole Chapman; Sarah Bauer Floyd; John Mobley; John Brooks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.