Literature DB >> 3354732

Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s.

P J Placek1, S M Taffel.   

Abstract

The incidence of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and characteristics of VBAC births are investigated using 1980-85 National Hospital Discharge Survey Data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. Only 3.4 per cent of mothers with previous cesarean delivery had VBAC in their subsequent 1980 delivery; this increased to 6.6 per cent in 1985. Because VBAC is a relatively infrequent event, 1980-85 data were combined and indicate that in this period 4.9 per cent of mothers with previous cesarean had a vaginal birth in their subsequent delivery. Combined 1980-85 VBAC rates are under 10 per cent for all age, race, marital status, region, hospital size, hospital ownership, and expected source of payment groups. Between 1980 and 1985, over 1.4 million repeat cesareans were performed for mothers having a live birth. Evidence suggests that potentially over 500,000 of these repeat cesareans could have been VBACs (over and above the 74,000 VBACs which occurred). VBAC mothers' mean length of hospital stay is 3.2 days, which compares closely with 3.0 days for other vaginal deliveries, but both contrast sharply with 5.6 days for repeat cesareans and 6.0 days for primary cesareans. Except for the uterine scar from the previous cesarean, VBAC mothers appear to have about the same history and frequency of complications as mothers with other vaginal deliveries. If the 500,000 repeat cesareans had been VBACs, surgical fees and costs for 1.2 million days of hospital stay would have been averted over the 1980-85 period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3354732      PMCID: PMC1349328          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.5.512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States.

Authors:  P H Shiono; J G Fielden; D McNellis; G G Rhoads; W H Pearse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987 Jan 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Trial of labor in patients with multiple previous cesarean sections.

Authors:  R P Porreco; P R Meier
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 0.142

3.  Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980.

Authors:  N Gleicher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Vaginal delivery in patients with a prior cesarean section.

Authors:  J P Lavin; R J Stephens; M Miodovnik; T P Barden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth.

Authors:  R H Paul; J P Phelan; S Y Yeh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Previous cesarean section and trial of labor. Factors related to uterine dehiscence.

Authors:  M P Tahilramaney; M Boucher; G S Eglinton; M Beall; J P Phelan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth.

Authors:  J N Martin; B A Harris; J F Huddleston; J C Morrison; M G Propst; W L Wiser; H W Perlis; J T Davidson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Trial labor following previous cesarean section.

Authors:  A R Graham
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Experience in private practice.

Authors:  E Gellman; M S Goldstein; S Kaplan; W J Shapiro
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Why women choose trial of labor or repeat cesarean section.

Authors:  C S McClain
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  7 in total

1.  Experiment and illusion in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  J Guillemin
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1994-03

2.  1986 C-sections rise; VBACs inch upward.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel; M Moien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Cesarean section, 1988--to have or have not!

Authors:  E J Quilligan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-12

4.  Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; H Bilodeau; R Blais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Factors influencing the practice of vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; L Potvin; R Blais; H Bilodeau
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Y Tony Yang; Michelle M Mello; S V Subramanian; David M Studdert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.983

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.