Literature DB >> 1869443

The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

D M Oleske1, G L Glandon, G J Giacomelli, S F Hohmann.   

Abstract

Knowledge of how cesarean birth rates vary by hospital characteristics may aid in understanding and perhaps modifying some of the structural and process components of newborn delivery services to decrease the necessity of birth by cesarean procedure. To examine the influence of select hospital characteristics, data on hospital newborn deliveries in Illinois for 1986 among women 10-50 years of age inclusive (N = 130,249) were obtained from computerized hospital discharge abstract files. Characteristics of the hospitals were obtained from the annual American Hospital Association survey. Adjusting for mother's age at delivery; presence of pregnancy, labor, and delivery complications; expected primary payer; and size of hospital, women delivering in hospitals with teaching status were less likely (odds ratio = 0.76, p less than .001, 95 percent CL: 0.73, 0.79) to have a primary cesarean birth than women delivering in hospitals without this designation. A significantly lower cesarean birth rate in teaching hospitals was also observed in women of all age groups, in Medicaid and non-Medicaid women, and for most categories of delivery complications. These data suggest the need to identify the programmatic, technologic, and manpower functions associated with hospital teaching status that could decrease the likelihood of a primary cesarean delivery. The study also suggests that changes aimed at the manner of diagnosis, monitoring, and/or management of pregnancy/delivery complications may reduce the cesarean birth rate because of large differences in the primary cesarean birth rate found between teaching and other hospitals for most categories of newborn delivery complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1869443      PMCID: PMC1069828     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  21 in total

1.  Hospital characteristics and mortality rates.

Authors:  A J Hartz; H Krakauer; E M Kuhn; M Young; S J Jacobsen; G Gay; L Muenz; M Katzoff; R C Bailey; A A Rimm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cesarean section in America: dramatic trends, 1970 to 1987.

Authors:  S M Taffel
Journal:  Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co       Date:  1989 Oct-Dec

3.  Characteristics of COTH member, other teaching, and non-teaching hospitals, 1987.

Authors:  J V Kelly
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  1986 C-sections rise; VBACs inch upward.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel; M Moien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Case-mix differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.

Authors:  M G Goldfarb; R M Coffey
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Association of electronic fetal monitoring during labor with cesarean section rate and with neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  J McCusker; D R Harris; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Changing rates of cesarean delivery: the Duke experience, 1978-1986.

Authors:  M L Hage; M J Helms; W E Hammond; C B Hammond
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Physician and hospital factors associated with mortality of surgical patients.

Authors:  J V Kelly; F J Hellinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.

Authors:  S A Myers; N Gleicher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.

Authors:  G L Goyert; S F Bottoms; M C Treadwell; P C Nehra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

3.  Maternal anthropometric factors and risk of primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  M J Shepard; A F Saftlas; L Leo-Summers; M B Bracken
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Health system factors and caesarean sections in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Alban Fejza; Mrika Aliu; Peter Jüni; David C Goodman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Caesarean sections in teaching hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitals in 22 countries.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Esra Zhubi; Krenare Grezda; Blerta Kryeziu; Jeta Bunjaku; Fitim Sadiku; Riaz Agahi; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Manila Bonciani; George Little
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.