Literature DB >> 3703662

Dichoptic temporal frequency differences do not lead to binocular rivalry.

R P O'Shea, R Blake.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3703662     DOI: 10.3758/bf03207584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Monocular and binocular rivalry between contours.

Authors:  N J Wade
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Binocular rivalry of achromatic colors.

Authors:  H WALLACH; P A ADAMS
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1954-09

3.  Threshold conditions for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R Blake
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision.

Authors:  J J Kulikowski; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  A new kind of stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  C Blakemore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The relationship between binocular rivalry and strabismic suppression.

Authors:  E L Smith; D M Levi; R E Manny; R S Harwerth; J M White
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli.

Authors:  R P O'Shea; B Crassini
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09

9.  Visual motion, binocular correspondence and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R Blake; L Zimba; D Williams
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  M Hollins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stimulus fractionation by interocular suppression.

Authors:  Asieh Zadbood; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Attention periodically samples competing stimuli during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeroen Ja van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Matthew J Davidson; David Alais
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The role of temporally coarse form processing during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; David Alais; Casper J Erkelens; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.