Literature DB >> 3967958

The relationship between binocular rivalry and strabismic suppression.

E L Smith, D M Levi, R E Manny, R S Harwerth, J M White.   

Abstract

Increment-threshold spectral sensitivity functions were determined for normal observers during binocular rivalry and for esotropic observers during strabismic suppression and under viewing conditions that normally induce binocular rivalry. Depending on the spatial and temporal properties of the test stimulus, the normal observers exhibited a wavelength-specific loss in sensitivity during the suppression phase of rivalry, which suggests that binocular rivalry differentially attenuates the sensitivity of the chromatic mechanisms relative to the luminance mechanisms. In contrast, regardless of the test stimulus dimensions, the esotropic observers did not manifest a wavelength-specific loss in sensitivity either during strabismic suppression or under conditions that normally induce binocular rivalry. The different patterns of suppression shown by the normal and esotropic subjects suggest that strabismic observers do not demonstrate normal binocular rivalry, and that strabismic suppression and normal binocular rivalry suppression are mediated by different neural mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3967958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  16 in total

1.  Metabolic mapping of suppression scotomas in striate cortex of macaques with experimental strabismus.

Authors:  J C Horton; D R Hocking; D L Adams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Eye preference within the context of binocular functions.

Authors:  Walter H Ehrenstein; Birgit E Arnold-Schulz-Gahmen; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition in amblyopia. The influence of the interocular difference on binocular contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  S Pardhan; J Gilchrist
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Physiology of suppression in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  R Harrad; F Sengpiel; C Blakemore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; David C Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Dichoptic temporal frequency differences do not lead to binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R P O'Shea; R Blake
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-01

7.  Interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects: the effect of unilateral attenuation with neutral density filters.

Authors:  U Leonards; R Sireteanu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07

8.  Effects of temporal frequency on binocular deficits in amblyopia.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Adriana Ferreira; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Rethinking amblyopia 2020.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Cortical metabolic activity matches the pattern of visual suppression in strabismus.

Authors:  Daniel L Adams; John R Economides; Lawrence C Sincich; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.