Literature DB >> 6672740

Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli.

J M Wolfe.   

Abstract

Orthogonal gratings, presented dichoptically, do not fuse into a single percept. Parts of each are seen while other parts are suppressed in an unstable perception (binocular rivalry). However, it has been previously noted that, if the gratings are briefly flashed, they will appear to fuse into a plaid or checkerboard pattern. Three experiments are reported which have been designed to define more clearly the spatial and temporal parameters of this effect in the hope that this would lead to better understanding of the normal mechanisms of dominance and suppression. Stimuli appear fused if flashed for less than 150 ms. The effect is independent of substantial changes in spatial frequency and luminance. Single flashes that appear fused when presented in isolation produce rivalry if separated by intervals less than about 150 ms. Intervals greater than 150 ms produce continued abnormal fusion. Possible mechanisms are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6672740     DOI: 10.1068/p120447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  50 in total

1.  Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages.

Authors:  W A van de Grind; P van Hof; M J van der Smagt; F A Verstraten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.

Authors:  Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Juliane Britz; Michael A Pitts; Christoph M Michel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  MEG phase follows conscious perception during binocular rivalry induced by visual stream segregation.

Authors:  Ramesh Srinivasan; Sanja Petrovic
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Binocular summation for reflexive eye movements.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Coexistence of binocular integration and suppression determined by surface border information.

Authors:  Yong Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeffrey Seely; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing.

Authors:  T J Andrews; D Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Duality in binocular rivalry: distinct sensitivity of percept sequence and percept duration to imbalance between monocular stimuli.

Authors:  Chen Song; Haishan Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.