Literature DB >> 4052502

Visual motion, binocular correspondence and binocular rivalry.

R Blake, L Zimba, D Williams.   

Abstract

Human observers dichoptically viewed displays consisting of isotropic random dots, with the dots in each eye's view all moving in a given direction or appearing stationary. When the interocular difference in direction of motion was less than 30 deg, a stable, fused percept resulted. Once this interocular difference was exceeded, binocular rivalry ensued. Rivalry was also obtained when dots seen by the two eyes moved in identical directions but at different velocities. Under this condition, the proportion of time that rivalry was experienced increased with the interocular difference in velocity. Moving dots predominated over stationary ones, and when both sets of dots moved there was no clear advantage of one speed of motion over the other. Contrary to some earlier reports, these results show that motion is not immune to binocular rivalry. Evidently the process responsible for establishing binocular correspondence between images received by the two eyes is sensitive to disparities in direction and velocity of motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4052502     DOI: 10.1007/BF00449596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  17 in total

1.  Monocular and binocular rivalry between contours.

Authors:  N J Wade
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  A computational theory of human stereo vision.

Authors:  D Marr; T Poggio
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-05-23

3.  Binocular single vision and perceptual processing.

Authors:  O J Braddick
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-06-04

4.  A new kind of stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  C Blakemore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence.

Authors:  J D Pettigrew; T Nikara; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The effect of imposed fixational eye movements on binocular rivalry.

Authors:  H W Sabrin; A E Kertesz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-08

8.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity.

Authors:  J H Maunsell; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  M Hollins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06

10.  Rapid measurement of contrast-sensitivity functions.

Authors:  R Sekuler; P Tynan
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1977-08
View more
  10 in total

1.  Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages.

Authors:  W A van de Grind; P van Hof; M J van der Smagt; F A Verstraten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Dichoptic temporal frequency differences do not lead to binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R P O'Shea; R Blake
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-01

3.  Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State.

Authors:  Guillaume Riesen; Anthony M Norcia; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Hazard detection with a monocular bioptic telescope.

Authors:  Amy L Doherty; Eli Peli; Gang Luo
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Evaluation of a Paradigm to Investigate Detection of Road Hazards when Using a Bioptic Telescope.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; P Matthew Bronstad; Lauren P Spano; Bidisha Huq; Xiaolan Tang; Amy Doherty; Eli Peli; Gang Luo
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Negligible fronto-parietal BOLD activity accompanying unreportable switches in bistable perception.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Randolph Blake; Tomas Knapen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Stimulus motion propels traveling waves in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Raymond van Ee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The spatial origin of a perceptual transition in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; Marnix Naber; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hazard Detection With Monocular Bioptic Telescopes in a Driving Simulator.

Authors:  Xiaolan Tang; P Matthew Bronstad; Amy L Doherty; Mojtaba Moharrer; Eli Peli; Gang Luo; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.283

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.