Literature DB >> 528894

Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement.

B A Williams.   

Abstract

Experiment 1 investigated component duration in a four-component multiple schedule designed to separate the effects of the preceding schedule of reinforcement from those of the following schedule of reinforcement. The preceding schedule in the preceding component had no consistent effect regardless of component duration. The following schedule was a powerful determinant of behavior, however, with higher response rates resulting from a following period of extinction. Moreover, the effect of the following schedule was greater with short component durations, which strongly suggests that component-duration effects previously found with multiple schedules are due generally to variation in the degree of control by the following schedule. Experiments 2--4 investigated the basis of the effects of the following schedule. In some situations differential responding in the following component was the controlling variable, but in others it was differential reinforcement in the following component. The results are consistent with the view that response rate during a stimulus is inversely related to the "value" of the following component, where the calculation of value must include both primary and conditioned reinforcement.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 528894     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.5.4.379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  26 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral contrast redux.

Authors:  Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Strict and random alternation in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral contrast: Pavlovian effects and anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  A D Hassin-Herman; N S Hemmes; B L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral contrast for key pecking as a function of component duration when only one component varies.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; C L Melville
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Violations of transitivity: Implications for a theory of contextual choice.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Inverse relations between preference and contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Contrast and reallocation of extraneous reinforcers between multiple-schedule components.

Authors:  A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Determinants of contrast in the signal-key procedure: Evidence against additivity theory.

Authors:  B A Williams; N Heyneman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior?

Authors:  J A Nevin; L D Smith; J Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.