| Literature DB >> 36236116 |
Karina Torres Pomini1,2, Daniela Vieira Buchaim2,3, Ana Carolina Cestari Bighetti1, Jesus Carlos Andreo1, Marcelie Priscila de Oliveira Rosso1, José Stalin Bayas Escudero1, Bruna Botteon Della Coletta1, Murilo Priori Alcalde4, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte4, Dimitrius Leonardo Pitol5, João Paulo Mardegan Issa5, Edilson Ervolino6, Matheus Bento Medeiros Moscatel7, Márcia Zilioli Bellini8, Alexandre Teixeira de Souza9, Wendel Cleber Soares10, Rogerio Leone Buchaim1,11.
Abstract
In this preclinical protocol, an adjunct method is used in an attempt to overcome the limitations of conventional therapeutic approaches applied to bone repair of large bone defects filled with scaffolds. Thus, we evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on the bone repair process on defects filled with demineralized bovine bone (B) and fibrin sealant (T). The groups were BC (blood clot), BT (B + T), BCP (BC + PBMT), and BTP (B + T + PBMT). Microtomographically, BC and BCP presented a hypodense cavity with hyperdense regions adjacent to the border of the wound, with a slight increase at 42 days. BT and BTP presented discrete hyperdensing areas at the border and around the B particles. Quantitatively, BCP and BTP (16.96 ± 4.38; 17.37 ± 4.38) showed higher mean bone density volume in relation to BC and BT (14.42 ± 3.66; 13.44 ± 3.88). Histologically, BC and BCP presented deposition of immature bone at the periphery and at 42 days new bone tissue became lamellar with organized total collagen fibers. BT and BTP showed inflammatory infiltrate along the particles, but at 42 days, it was resolved, mainly in BTP. In the birefringence analysis, BT and BTP, the percentage of red birefringence increased (9.14% to 20.98% and 7.21% to 27.57%, respectively), but green birefringence was similar in relation to 14 days (3.3% to 3.5% and 3.5% to 4.2%, respectively). The number of osteocytes in the neoformed bone matrix proportionally reduced in all evaluated groups. Immunostaining of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-2/4), osteocalcin (OCN), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were higher in BCP and BTP when compared to the BC and BT groups (p < 0.05). An increased number of TRAP positive cells (tartrate resistant acid phosphatase) was observed in BT and BTP. We conclude that PBMT positively influenced the repair of bone defects filled with B and T.Entities:
Keywords: biomaterial; bone repair; bone substitute; fibrin sealant; low-level laser therapy; photobiomodulation therapy; polymers; scaffolds
Year: 2022 PMID: 36236116 PMCID: PMC9572221 DOI: 10.3390/polym14194170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Allocation of the specimens in two large groups: BC and BT. (A) Preparation and reconstitution of TisseelTM. (A) The fibrin components vials were preheated. (A) Mixture of fibrin sealant components: sealant protein concentrate plus aprotinin solution (1) and freeze-dried human thrombin plus calcium chloride solution (2). (A) B was mixed with the reconstituted solutions (1 and 2). (A) BT group (B plus T). (A) Subdivision: BT (without PBMT) and BTP (with PBMT). (B) Blood collection by cardiac puncture. (B) BC group—the defects were filled with blood from cardiac puncture. (B) Subdivision: BC (without PBMT) and BCP (with PBMT). (C) Illustrative figure: 90° laser emitter, 4-point application, time 24 s/point.
Figure 2Healing of rat calvarial defects assessed by micro-CT. (2A,2B) 14 and 42 days: 2D views of transaxial (2A1–2B1), coronal (2A2–2B2) sections. Images show the evolution of the repair of defects filled with clot (BC and BCP) and fibrin sealant plus demineralized bovine bone (BT and BTP). Biomaterial particles (yellow arrow), newly formed bone tissue at the defect edges and under the dura mater (blue arrow) and red-dotted arrow (transaxial) indicate the central region of the defect corresponding to the coronal section. All scaled image sized 3 mm.
Mean ± standard deviation of volume and percentage of structures into defect obtained by 3D-morphometry on micro-CT images.
| Parameter | Period (Days) | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | BCP | BT | BTP | ||
| Total volume (TV, mm3) | 14 | 36.52 ± 3.59 aA | 36.22 ± 3.48 aA | 114.0 ± 9.20 bA | 112.8 ± 11.84 bA |
| 42 | 36.60 ± 3.35 aA | 35.80 ± 4.38 aA | 115.4 ± 13.3 bA | 106.7 ± 13.72 bA | |
| Material volume (MV, mm3) | 14 | - | - | 41.09 ± 5.90 aA | 42.35 ± 8.32 aA |
| 42 | - | - | 41.28 ± 7.73 aA | 35.97 ± 5.57 aA | |
| Bone volume (BV, mm3) | 14 | 2.93 ± 1.43 aA | 3.02 ± 0.71 aA | 17.76 ± 3.52 bA | 19.88 ± 5.47 bA |
| 42 | 5.20 ± 1.02 aB | 6.16 ± 2.10 aB | 15.56 ± 4.68 bA | 18.17 ± 3.04 bA | |
| Soft tissue volume (StV, mm3) | 14 | 33.59 ± 2.94 aA | 33.20 ± 3.19 aA | 50.61 ± 5.34 bA | 56.88 ± 9.82 bA |
| 42 | 31.40 ± 4.00 aA | 29.64 ± 3.00 aA | 58.51 ± 13.1 bA | 52.61 ± 13.5 bA | |
| Material volume (MV/TV, %) | 14 | - | - | 36.20 ± 5.71 aA | 37.52 ± 5.75 aA |
| 42 | - | - | 35.99 ± 7.00 aA | 33.85 ± 4.50 aA | |
| Bone volume (BV/TV, %) | 14 | 7.89 ± 3.54 aA | 8.32 ± 1.60 aA | 15.53 ± 2.38 bA | 17.56 ± 4.04 bA |
| 42 | 14.42 ± 3.66 aB | 16.96 ± 4.38 aB | 13.44 ± 3.88 aA | 17.37 ± 4.38 aA | |
| Soft tissue volume (StV/TV, %) | 14 | 92.10 ± 3.54 aA | 91.68 ± 1.60 aA | 48.27 ± 7.21 bA | 44.92 ± 3.02 bA |
| 42 | 85.58 ± 3.66 aB | 83.04 ± 4.38 aB | 50.57 ± 9.74 bA | 48.78 ± 8.16 bA | |
Different small letters (line comparison, BC vs. BCP vs. BT vs. BTP in each period, 14 or 42 days, a ≠ b) indicate a statistically significant difference. Different capital letters (comparison in columns, 14 vs. 42 days, in each parameter, A ≠ B) indicate a significant difference. Values: mean ± standard deviation. ANOVA followed by Tukey test and Student’s test respectively, are both at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Histological views (3A) in calvaria defects created in the animals. BC and BCP treated with blood clot and BT and BTP treated with demineralized bovine bone plus fibrin sealant at experimental periods 14 and 42 days (3A1,3A2). At 14 days: BC and BCP groups showed bone growth (asterisks) adjacent to the defect border (b) and on the dura-mater surface. The BT and BTP groups showed a discrete bone growth (asterisks) on the border and the defect was filled by graft particles (demineralized bovine bone) surrounded by a reactional tissue (RT) containing some inflammatory cells (3A1). At 42 days: BC and BCP both groups showed similar bone formation with gradual increase in thickness of trabeculae, leading to a compact structure limited to the defect border. Closure of large part of the defect by fibrous connective tissue (CT). In BT and BTP groups, the graft particles and inflammatory process decreased but did not disappear and only small bone formation was present on the lesion border (3A2). (Masson’s trichrome; original magnification 10×; bar = 500 µm and Insets, magnified images 40×; bar = 100 µm).
Figure 4Histological images of birefringent fibers stained with picrosirius red at 14 and 42 days of repair (4A–4B). Images of the defect border and in the central region in two experimental periods (4A1–4A2, 4B1–4B2). The red-orange birefringence color with immature bone formation containing thin and disorganized collagen fibers. Yellow-green color was associated with lamellar/mature bone. Original magnification 10×, scale bar 100 µm. Birefringence analysis of collagen fibers (4C): graphs of total of birefringence collagen fibers (4C1), green birefringence of collagen fibers (4C2), red birefringence of collagen fibers (4C3), and yellow birefringence of collagen fibers (4C4) in the bone tissue for each group. n = 8/group and periods (BC and BCP) and n = 10/group and periods (BT and BTP). * Standard deviation and different letters p < 0.05 between periods/group (ANOVA) and groups/period (“t” test).
Mean ± standard deviation of numbers of osteocytes.
| Cell Numbers/mm2 Bone Matrix | Period (Days) | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | BCP | BT | BTP | ||
| Osteocytes | 14 | 787 ± 111.6 aA | 764 ± 222.7 aA | 789 ± 80.2 aA | 740 ± 43.8 aA |
| 42 | 558 ± 50.2 aB | 476 ± 87.3 aB | 453 ± 65.1 aB | 493 ± 79.0 aB | |
Same small letters (line comparison, BC vs. BCP vs. BT vs. BTP in each period, 14 or 42 days, a = a) indicate that there was no significant difference. Different capital letters (comparison in columns, 14 vs. 42 days, A ≠ B) indicate a statistically significant difference. Values: mean ± standard deviation. ANOVA followed by the Tukey test and Student’s test, respectively, are both at p < 0.05.
Figure 5(5A,5B) Histological sections showing the appearance representative of immunolabeling after 14 and 42 days respectively in experimental groups BC and BCP treated with blood clot biostimulated by laser or not and BT and BTP treated with demineralized bovine bone plus fibrin sealant biostimulated by laser or not. The black arrows point to places where the brown spot marks the proteins: (5A1) immunolabeling for bone morphogenetic protein (BMP—2) in bone defects at 14 days. BMP—2/4—positive cells (arrows); connective tissue (CT). (5A2) Immunomarking pattern for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in bone defect at 14 days. VEGF—positive cells (arrows); connective tissue (CT). (5B1) Immunomarking pattern for osteocalcin (OCN) in bone defect at 42 days. OCN—positive cells (arrows); connective tissue (CT) and bone tissue (B). (5B2) Immunomarking pattern for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) in bone defect at 42 days. TRAP—positive cells (arrows). Harris’ hematoxylin counterstaining (Scale bars: 25 μm and 50 μm; original magnification: 40× and 100×, respectively).
Comparison of the scores attributed to the immunostaining for BMP, VEGF, and OCN proteins in the defects of each experimental group by the Kruskal–Wallis test.
| Parameter | Period (Days) | Groups: Median (Min–Max) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | BCP | BT | BTP | ||
| BMP | 14 days | 1(1-1) A | 2(2-3) B | 1(1-1) A | 2(2-2) B |
| 42 days | 1(1-1) A | 2(2-3) B | 1(1-1) A | 2(2-3) B | |
| VEGF | 14 days | 1(1-1) A | 3(2-3) B | 1(1-2) A | 2(2-2) AB |
| 42 days | 1(1-2) A,B | 3(2-3) B | 1(1-1) A | 3(2-3) B | |
| OCN | 14 days | 1(1-1) A | 2(2-2) B | 1(1-1) A | 2(1-2) AB |
| 42 days | 1(1-1) A | 2(2-2) B | 1(1-1) A | 2(2-2) B | |
Different capital letters (comparison in lines, BC vs. BCP vs. BT vs. BTP in each period, 14 or 42 days A ≠ B) indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Mean ± standard deviation of TRAP positive cells.
| Cell Numbers/mm2 Bone Matrix | Period (Days) | Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | BCP | BT | BTP | ||
| TRAP+ | 14 | 2.8 ± 0.84 aA | 4.8 ± 0.83 bA | 20.2 ± 4.02 cA | 30.4 ± 1.34 dA |
| 42 | 4.0 ± 1.23 aA | 5.8 ± 2.19 bA | 22.0 ± 2.45 cA | 36.6 ± 4.51 dB | |
Different small letters (line comparison, BC vs. BCP vs. BT vs. BTP in each period, 14 or 42 days, a ≠ b ≠ c ≠ d) indicate a significant difference. Different capital letters (comparison in columns, 14 vs. 42 days, A ≠ B) indicate a significant difference. Values: mean ± standard deviation. ANOVA followed by the Tukey test and Student’s test, respectively, are both at p < 0.05.
Data on materials used in transplant therapy and the corresponding mechanisms of action leading to bone regeneration.
| Biomaterials | Characteristics | Mechanism of Action |
|---|---|---|
| Bio-OssTM | HAP(h) ∼ HAP (x) |
Slow macrophage biodegradability—longer cell support time, Mechanical resistance [ |
| 70–75% porosity |
Extensive surface area > cell adhesion [ | |
| Interconnected micro and macropores (300–1500 µm) |
Prevents soft tissue invagination into the defect, Osteoconductivity—cell mechanical support [ | |
| Deproteinization (≤300 °C)—no organic components |
Biocompatibility—non-immunogenic [ | |
| Tisseel Lyo™ | Cross-linked fibrin |
Viscoelasticity property—tissue flap stability [ |
| Fibrin polymerization—fibrin polymer |
Binding effect of particulate biomaterial [ | |
| Aprotinin component (antifibrinolytic) |
Cellular support throughout the trial period (∼ 40 days) [ | |
| Blood components |
Bioactive 3D matrix—binding sites: platelets, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, neutrophils, and macrophages and also for molecules, proteins and growth factors [ Biocompatibility and biodegradability (fibrinolysis) [ | |
| Hemostatic mechanisms |
Thrombus—angiogenic cells (surgical hemostasis) [ |
HAP (h)—human hydroxyapatite; HAP (x)—xenogenic hydroxyapatite.