Literature DB >> 26225012

Comparative, Histological and Histomorphometric Analysis of Three Anorganic Bovine Xenogenous Bone Substitutes: Bio-Oss, Bone-Fill and Gen-Ox Anorganic.

Rafael Manfro1, Fabiano Silva Fonseca2, Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi3, Wilson Roberto Sendyk4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anorganic bovine xenogenous grafts show the best performance as bone substitutes in implantodontics. Bio-Oss is the world's most widely used and investigated anorganic bone substitute. This article compares two anorganic bovine bone substitutes (Bone-Fill and Gen-Ox anorganic) with Bio-Oss.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight New Zealand rabbits were implanted with 4 titanium cylinders randomly filled with Bio-Oss, Bone-Fill, Gen-Ox anorganic or a blood clot. Four animals were sacrificed after 8 weeks; 12 weeks later, the remaining four were sacrificed. The contents of the cylinders were removed, cut and stained with HE before they were evaluated with an optical microscope. The samples were submitted to histomorphometry for analysis.
RESULTS: The bone formation with Bio-Oss at 8 weeks was 8.43 mm(2); at 12 weeks, it was 9.32 mm(2). The bone formation with Bone-Fill at 8 weeks was 7.24 mm(2); at 12 weeks, it was 9.01 mm(2). The bone formation with Gen-Ox anorganic at 8 weeks was 2.78 mm(2); at 12 weeks, it was 3.02 mm(2). The bone formation with the blood clot at 8 weeks was 0.65 mm(2); at 12 weeks, it was 0.63 mm(2).
CONCLUSION: Following this model, Bone-Fill was comparable to Bio-Oss and superior to Gen-Ox and blood clot.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anorganic bovine xenogenous graft; Bone reconstruction; Osseointegrated implants

Year:  2013        PMID: 26225012      PMCID: PMC4518797          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-013-0554-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  26 in total

1.  Bone graft substitutes: a comparative qualitative histologic review of current osteoconductive grafting materials.

Authors:  K A Al Ruhaimi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  In vitro osteoclast resorption of bone substitute biomaterials used for implant site augmentation: a pilot study.

Authors:  James C Taylor; Sheldon E Cuff; James P L Leger; Amani Morra; Gail I Anderson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs.

Authors:  Thomas Jensen; Søren Schou; Hans Jørgen G Gundersen; Julie Lyng Forman; Hendrik Terheyden; Palle Holmstrup
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  A clinical study of 406 sinus augmentations with 100% anorganic bovine bone.

Authors:  Carlos E A Ferreira; Arthur B Novaes; Violet I Haraszthy; Márcio Bittencourt; Carolina B Martinelli; Sonia M Luczyszyn
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans.

Authors:  M Piattelli; G A Favero; A Scarano; G Orsini; A Piattelli
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Influence of decortication of the donor bone on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit skull bone.

Authors:  A K Lundgren; D Lundgren; C H Hämmerle; S Nyman; L Sennerby
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  A single-centre randomized controlled clinical trial on the adjunct treatment of intra-bony defects with autogenous bone or a xenograft: results after 12 months.

Authors:  Ahmad Aghazadeh; G Rutger Persson; Stefan Renvert
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  Comparative investigation of the effects of different materials used with a titanium barrier on new bone formation.

Authors:  Şeref Ezirganlı; Serkan Polat; Emre Barış; İlkan Tatar; Hakan Hamdi Çelik
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials.

Authors:  C H Hämmerle; N P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Bone formation with two types of grafting materials: a histologic and histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Amir Reza Rokn; Mohammad Amin Khodadoostan; Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Puria Motahhary; Mohammad Javad Kharrazi Fard; Hugo De Bruyn; Rose Afzalifar; Ehsan Soolar; Ahmad Soolari
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2011-07-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  Bone defect rehabilitation using lyophilized bone preshaped on a stereolithographic model.

Authors:  Lauren Oliveira Lima Bohner; Eduardo Mukai; Sueli Mukai; Pedro Tortamano; Newton Sesma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

2.  SEM-EDX Study of the Degradation Process of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures.

Authors:  María Piedad Ramírez Fernández; Sergio A Gehrke; Carlos Pérez Albacete Martinez; Jose L Calvo Guirado; Piedad N de Aza
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 3.  Emerging Perspectives in Scaffold for Tissue Engineering in Oral Surgery.

Authors:  Gabriele Ceccarelli; Rossella Presta; Laura Benedetti; Maria Gabriella Cusella De Angelis; Saturnino Marco Lupi; Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 5.443

4.  Biological Behavior of Xenogenic Scaffolds in Alcohol-Induced Rats: Histomorphometric and Picrosirius Red Staining Analysis.

Authors:  Dayane Maria Braz Nogueira; André Luiz de Faria Figadoli; Patrícia Lopes Alcantara; Karina Torres Pomini; Iris Jasmin Santos German; Carlos Henrique Bertoni Reis; Geraldo Marco Rosa Júnior; Marcelie Priscila de Oliveira Rosso; Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos; Mariana Schutzer Ragghianti Zangrando; Eliana de Souza Bastos Mazuqueli Pereira; Miguel Ângelo de Marchi; Beatriz Flavia de Moraes Trazzi; Jéssica de Oliveira Rossi; Samira Salmeron; Cláudio Maldonado Pastori; Daniela Vieira Buchaim; Rogerio Leone Buchaim
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.329

5.  Comparison of Two Bovine Commercial Xenografts in the Regeneration of Critical Cranial Defects.

Authors:  Carlos Humberto Valencia-Llano; Diego López-Tenorio; Marcela Saavedra; Paula A Zapata; Carlos David Grande-Tovar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  Use of Photobiomodulation Combined with Fibrin Sealant and Bone Substitute Improving the Bone Repair of Critical Defects.

Authors:  Karina Torres Pomini; Daniela Vieira Buchaim; Ana Carolina Cestari Bighetti; Jesus Carlos Andreo; Marcelie Priscila de Oliveira Rosso; José Stalin Bayas Escudero; Bruna Botteon Della Coletta; Murilo Priori Alcalde; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Dimitrius Leonardo Pitol; João Paulo Mardegan Issa; Edilson Ervolino; Matheus Bento Medeiros Moscatel; Márcia Zilioli Bellini; Alexandre Teixeira de Souza; Wendel Cleber Soares; Rogerio Leone Buchaim
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.967

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.