Literature DB >> 22376122

Slow resorption of anorganic bovine bone by osteoclasts in maxillary sinus augmentation.

Pablo Galindo-Moreno1, Pedro Hernández-Cortés, Francisco Mesa, Nelson Carranza, Gintaras Juodzbalys, Mariano Aguilar, Francisco O'Valle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Different biomaterials have been suggested for guided bone regeneration (GBR). These might show the ideal properties to let a new bone formation in the grafted area. Among these ideal features, it is essential their controlled resorption in order to be replaced for new vital bone. Bovine bone has been used widely as a good biomaterial for GBR, however there is still an interesting controversy about its resorbable capacity. In this sense, the objective of this study was to examine the behavior of anorganic bovine bone (ABB) in long-term maxillary sinus graft healing and study its relationship with morphological and morphometrical variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen maxillary sinus augmentation procedures were performed in patients. Bone cores were obtained from implant receptor sites at 6 months, 3 years, and 7 years of implant placement for histological, morphometric, and immunohistochemical (tartrate resistant acid phosphatase [TRAP]/cathepsin K/CD68) studies.
RESULTS: The percentages of bone, ABB particles, connective tissue, osteocytes, and osteoblasts in maxillary sinus grafts were similar at 6 months, 3 years, and 7 years. A progressive and significant decrease was detected in osteoclasts (p = .05, Kruskal-Wallis test), TRAP and cathepsin K expression (p = .014 and p = .021, respectively), and osteoid lines (p = .038).
CONCLUSION: According to these data, a decrease in osteoclasts over time may, partially, explain the ABB persistence observed in core biopsies. Further studies with more cases and different graft maturation times are required to elucidate the resorption rates and cell events underlying these phenomena.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TRAP; anorganic bovine bone; bone remodeling; cathepsin K; immunohistochemistry; intrasinus graft; osteoclasts; osteocyte; resorption

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22376122     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00445.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  8 in total

1.  SEM-EDX Study of the Degradation Process of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures.

Authors:  María Piedad Ramírez Fernández; Sergio A Gehrke; Carlos Pérez Albacete Martinez; Jose L Calvo Guirado; Piedad N de Aza
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Bone Healing in Extraction Sockets Covered With Collagen Membrane Alone or Associated With Porcine-Derived Bone Graft: a Comparative Histological and Histomorphometric Analysis.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Luca Testarelli; Luigi Stefanelli; Francesca De Angelis; Francesca Mencio; Giorgio Pompa; Stefano Di Carlo
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2017-12-31

3.  Histologic and Histomorphometric Analysis of Bone Regeneration with Bovine Grafting Material after 24 Months of Healing. A Case Report.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Fabrizio Belleggia; Patricia DeVillier; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-08-08

4.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing bovine versus porcine bone xenografts mixed with autogenous bone graft. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Dario Abril-García; Ana Belen Carrillo-Galvez; Federico Zurita; Natividad Martín-Morales; Francisco O'Valle; Miguel Padial-Molina
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  Use of Photobiomodulation Combined with Fibrin Sealant and Bone Substitute Improving the Bone Repair of Critical Defects.

Authors:  Karina Torres Pomini; Daniela Vieira Buchaim; Ana Carolina Cestari Bighetti; Jesus Carlos Andreo; Marcelie Priscila de Oliveira Rosso; José Stalin Bayas Escudero; Bruna Botteon Della Coletta; Murilo Priori Alcalde; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Dimitrius Leonardo Pitol; João Paulo Mardegan Issa; Edilson Ervolino; Matheus Bento Medeiros Moscatel; Márcia Zilioli Bellini; Alexandre Teixeira de Souza; Wendel Cleber Soares; Rogerio Leone Buchaim
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.967

6.  Surgical Approaches Based on Biological Objectives: GTR versus GBR Techniques.

Authors:  Gaia Pellegrini; Giorgio Pagni; Giulio Rasperini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-06-13

7.  In Vitro Comparison of Macrophage Polarization and Osteoblast Differentiation Potentials between Granules and Block Forms of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral.

Authors:  Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Simon D Marjanowski; Michihide Kono; Hiroki Katagiri; Richard J Miron; Benoit Schaller
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  The migration of the bovine-derived xenograft particles: A case series.

Authors:  Hessam Nowzari; Chang Teoh; Angel Emmanuel Rodriguez
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2022-03-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.