| Literature DB >> 36224240 |
Ifra Hassan1, Adil Gani2, Mudasir Ahmad1, Javid Banday3.
Abstract
The valorization of new polymer sources from underutilized plants as structuring, encapsulating, and texturizing agents for food and nutraceutical applications is gaining attention. This provides an opportunity where inexpensive plant-sourced biopolymers can play an impactful role, on both ecological and economic aspects performing equivalently effectual yet cost-effective substitutes to synthetic polymers. With this aim, we explored the use of mucilage from Althea rosea and reveal its physicochemical, in vitro antidiabetic and antihypertensive activity. Besides, structural, micrometric, crystallization, and anti-microbial properties was also seen. We determined the probable structure of the extracted mucilage by FTIR which confirmed the residues of saccharides as galactose and uronic acid with α and β configurations. It consists of 78.26% carbohydrates, 3.51% ashes, and 3.72% proteins. Here, we show that the mucilage offered protection to DNA against the oxidative damage caused by (-OH) radicals and the morphology of the mucilage particles displayed a fibrillary material settled in a net-like, tangled structure. Our results demonstrate that the reconstituted mucilage powder exhibited good water holding capacity (2.89 g water/g mucilage), solubility (27.33%), and oil holding capacity (1.79 g oil/g mucilage). Moreover, high emulsifying property (95.83%) and foaming capacity (17.04%) was noted. Our results indicate that A.rosea mucilage can potentially serve as economical and eco-friendly hydrocolloid substitute for the food and nutraceutical industry owing to its functional, hypo-lipidemic, anti-hyperglycemic, antioxidant, and anti-bacterial properties.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36224240 PMCID: PMC9556774 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20134-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Effect of temperature and pH on the yield of mucilage.
| Temperature (°C) | pH | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 66 | 10.8 | 14.6 |
| 69 | 11.3 | 15.44 |
| 72 | 11.5 | 16.81 |
| 75 | 11.7 | 17 |
Phytochemical confirmation tests on the isolated mucilage of A.roseamucilage.
| Phytochemicals | Test performed | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Mucilage | Ruthenium red test and Molish test | Pink color |
| Purple color | ||
| Starch | Iodine test | − ive |
| Tannins | Ferric chloride | + ive |
| Alkaloids | Wagner’s test and Mayer’s test | − ive |
| Steroids | Libermann-Burchard’s test | + ive |
| Glycosides | Legal’s and Borntrager’s test | + ive |
| Saponins | Froth test | + ive |
Flow property and color values of A.rosea mucilage.
| Flow property | Result |
|---|---|
| Bulk density | 0.66 g/ml |
| Tapped density | 0.72 g/ml |
| Hausner’s ratio | 1.09 |
| % Compressibility index | 8.33 |
| L* | 42.38 ± 1.46 |
| a* | -0.05 ± 0.07 |
| b* | 1.87 ± 0.24 |
All results are expressed as the means ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 1Image of A.rosea mucilage (a); Particle size distribution (b); and XRD (c).
Figure 2FTIR spectra of mucilage.
Figure 3Electron microscopic images of A.rosea mucilage. (a). Fibrillary mucilaginous material arranged in a tangled, net-like structure; (b). Magnification image demonstrating the crust-like character of the mucilage. Scale bars:A–450 nm;B–170 µm.
Solubility(%), Oil holding capacity (OHC), Water holding capacity (WHC) and Swelling index (SI) as a function of temperature.
| Temperature (°C) | Solubility (%) | OHC (g oil/g mucilage) | WHC (g water/g mucilage) | Swelling Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH = 2 | pH = 6 | pH = 8 | ||||
| 20 | 12.1 ± 0.1cB | 0.88 ± 0.03bD | 1.28 ± 0.1bD | 6.18 ± 0.3aC | 9.05 ± 0.4aC | 18.41 ± 0.7aA |
| 35 | 18.02 ± 0.3bB | 1.54 ± 0.07aE | 2.31 ± 0.2aD | 8.27 ± 0.4aC | 11.03 ± 0.6aC | 20.34 ± 0.3aA |
| 50 | 27.33 ± 0.4aB | 0.79 ± 0.16aE | 2.89 ± 0.4aD | 11.51 ± 0.2aC | 12.86 ± 0.6aC | 22.31 ± 0.5aA |
a–cBars with different lowercase letters indicate a significantly (p < 0.05) different solubility, OHC, WHC and SI of a sample at different temperatures by Tukey's test. A–CBars with different uppercase letters indicate a significantly (p < 0.05) different solubility, OHC, WHC and SI among samples at the same temperature by Tukey's test.
Data represent means ± respective standard errors (n = 3).
Foaming capacity, foaming stability, emulsifying property and emulsifying stability of A.rosea mucilage as a function of weight (%).
| Weight (%) | Foaming capacity (%) | Foaming stability (%) | Emulsifying property (%) | Emulsion stability (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 11.77 ± 0.47bB | 5.14 ± 0.55bC | 86.41 ± 0.72bA | 89.45 ± 0.35aA |
| 0.6 | 13.51 ± 0.50bB | 8.77 ± 0.63aB | 89.69 ± 0.29bA | 87.13 ± 0.66aA |
| 0.9 | 16.23 ± 0.12aC | 9.38 ± 0.31aD | 93.22 ± 0.78aA | 84.68 ± 0.44bB |
| 1.2 | 16.23 ± 0.12aC | 12.90 ± 0.33aD | 95.83 ± 0.45aA | 82.82 ± 0.50bB |
a–cBars with different lowercase letters indicate a significantly (p < 0.05) different foaming capacity, foaming stability, emulsifying property and emulsifying stability of a sample at different temperatures by Tukey's test. A–CBars with different uppercase letters indicate a significantly (p < 0.05) different foaming capacity, foaming stability, emulsifying property and emulsifying stability among samples at the same temperature by Tukey's test.
Data represent means ± respective standard errors (n = 3).
Figure 4Antioxidant activity against oxidative damage to DNA formucilage, Lane 1: Calfthymus DNA. Lane 2: (DNA + Fenton’s reaction), Lane3: (DNA + Fenton’s reaction + 20µL of extract). Lane 4: (DNA + Fenton’s reaction + 30µL of extract). Lane 5: (DNA + Fenton’s reaction + 50µL of extract). Lane6: (DNA + Fenton’s reaction + 100µL of extract). Lane 7:(DNA + H2O2). (Fentons reaction = ferricnitrate + H2O2 + ascorbic acid).
Figure 5(a) α-amylase inhibition(%); (b) α-glucosidase inhibition (%) of mucilage at different concentrations.
Figure 6Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitory activity of mucilage at different concentrations. Values are mean of three replications.
Figure 7Representative pictures of inhibition zone of mucilage against different studied microorganisms. MU represents plant mucilage and A.D represents antibiotic disc (Gentamicin discs).