| Literature DB >> 20668577 |
Shuge Tian1, Yang Shi, Qian Yu, Halmurat Upur.
Abstract
A simple, precise, rapid and accurate, binary-phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the determination of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid contents in the Ziziphora clinopodioides Lam. with short run time. Chromatographic separation is achieved by using HPLC system consisting of a Shimadzu LC-6AD and Kromasil C(18) column (150 x 4.6 mm, 10 mum, with pre-column), the mobile phase consists of methanol and 0.03 M phosphate buffer (pH = 3, 90:10). Detection wavelength is 214 nm. The speed of flow is 0.5 ml/min. The specimen handing quantity is 10 mul. The oleanolic acid's linearity range is 0.4 ~ 1.2 mg/ml (r = 0.9996). The ursolic acid's linearity range is 0.6 ~ 1.8 mg/ml (r = 0.9996), and the linear relationship is accurate. The average recovery (n = 6) of oleanolic acid is 99.5% (RSD = 1.19%) and ursolic acid is 102.3% (RSD = 1.25%). The content of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid in Ziziphora clinopodioides are 0.76 mg/g and 1.176 mg/g, respectively. The developed HPLC method can therefore be applied to both in vitro studies of oleanolic acid and ursolic acid formulations as well as drug estimation in biological samples.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC; Ziziphora clinopodioides Lam; oleanolic acid; ursolic acid
Year: 2010 PMID: 20668577 PMCID: PMC2900058 DOI: 10.4103/0973-1296.62898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacogn Mag ISSN: 0973-1296 Impact factor: 1.085
Figure 1Standard solution chromatogram (A: Oleanolic acid, B: Ursolic acid)
Figure 2Ziziphora clinopodioides sample solution chromatogram (A: Oleanolic acid, B: Ursolic acid)
Precision conclusion
| No | Oleanolic acid sample peak area integral value | Ursolic acid sample peak area integral value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4436286 | 4842616 | |
| 2 | 4602612 | 4962482 | |
| 3 | 4581736 | 4947798 | |
| 4 | 4624223 | 4996164 | |
| 5 | 4615594 | 4993141 | |
| 6 | 4596357 | 4949598 | |
| RSD (%) | 1.53 | 1.13 |
Stability conclusion
| Time (h) | Oleanolic acid peak area integral value | Ursolic acid peak area integral value |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3884202 | 4233366 |
| 2 | 3828496 | 4151307 |
| 4 | 3841187 | 4125055 |
| 6 | 3794021 | 4089668 |
| 8 | 3741026 | 4063406 |
| RSD (%) | 1.40 | 1.58 |
Reproducibility conclusion
| No. | Oleanolic acid peak area integral value | Ursolic acid peak area integral vaule |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3840722 | 4294788 |
| 2 | 3781915 | 4203736 |
| 3 | 3692671 | 4176719 |
| 4 | 3748147 | 4175203 |
| 5 | 3895012 | 4227854 |
| 6 | 3798748 | 4308687 |
| RSD (%) | 1.86 | 1.62 |
Recovery rate of oleanolic acid conclusion
| Sampling quantity(g) | Sample content A(mg) | Addition B(mg) | Determination C(mg) | Recovery(%) | Average(%) | RSD(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.00 | 3.80 | 3.80 | 7.64 | 101.1 | ||
| 5.00 | 3.80 | 3.80 | 7.59 | 99.7 | ||
| 5.00 | 3.80 | 3.80 | 7.51 | 97.6 | 99.5 | 1.19 |
| 5.00 | 3.80 | 3.80 | 7.58 | 99.5 | ||
| 5.00 | 3.80 | 3.80 | 7.56 | 98.9 | ||
| 5.00 | 3.80 | 3.80 | 7.61 | 100.2 |
Recovery rate = [(C-A)/B]×100%
Recovery rate of ursolic acid conclusion
| Sampling quantity(g) | Sample content A(mg) | Addition B (mg) | Determination C(mg) | Recovery (%) | Average (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.00 | 5.88 | 5.92 | 12.01 | 103.5 | ||
| 5.00 | 5.88 | 5.92 | 11.93 | 102.1 | ||
| 5.00 | 5.88 | 5.92 | 11.83 | 100.5 | 102.3 | 1.25 |
| 5.00 | 5.88 | 5.92 | 11.95 | 102.5 | ||
| 5.00 | 5.88 | 5.92 | 12.03 | 103.8 | ||
| 5.00 | 5.88 | 5.92 | 11.87 | 101.2 |
Recovery rate = [(C-A)/B]×100%