| Literature DB >> 28571499 |
Parvaiz A Dar1, Fasil Ali1, Ishfaq A Sheikh2, Showkat A Ganie1, Tanveer A Dar1.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Alcea rosea L. (Malvaceae) has various medicinal uses including anticancer, anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. However, there is no report on its antidiabetic activity.Entities:
Keywords: Hyperglycaemic; antidiabetic; glutathione; oxidative stress; phenolic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28571499 PMCID: PMC6130437 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2017.1333127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
Figure 1.Total phenolic content of Alcea rosea seed extracts. The experiments were carried out in triplicates.
Variation in fasting blood glucose level after oral administration of Alcea rosea extracts in alloxan induced diabetic rats.
| Fasting blood glucose level (mg/dl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | 0th day | 7th day | 15th day |
| Group I (Normal) | 100.5 ± 9.8 | 92.7 ± 9.3 | 101 ± 4.6 |
| Group II (Diabetic) | 360.7 ± 15.4 | 377.5 ± 13.1 | 408.5 ± 10.5 |
| Group III (Metformin) | 352.3 ± 10.05 | 201.09 ± 9.6 | 116.8 ± 11.53 |
| Group IV (ARA 100) | 370.2 ± 8.2 | 351.2 ± 8.4 | 306.7 ± 11.9 |
| Group V (ARA 300) | 361.5 ± 10.7 | 310.2 ± 10.6 | 274.7 ± 14.6 |
| Group VI (ARM 100) | 365.7 ± 11.1 | 289.5 ± 5.9 | 259.5 ± 6.60 |
| Group VII (ARM 300) | 370.2 ± 12.7 | 268.5 ± 6.7 | 199.2 ± 7.1 |
The values were presented as mean ± SD for six animals in each observation and evaluated by one way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni t‐test to detect inter group differences.
p< 0.001, as compared with normal control group.
p< 0.001, as compared with Diabetic group.
p< 0.001, as compared with Metformin.
Nonsignificant as compared with Metformin.
Figure 2.Effect of aqueous and methanol extracts of Alcea rosea seed on lipid peroxidation of liver and pancreas in alloxan induced diabetic rat models. *p < 0.001, as compared with normal control group. **p < 0.001 as compared with diabetic group. Each value is a mean ± SD (n = 6 in each group). The experiments were carried out in triplicates.
Figure 3.Effect of aqueous and methanol extracts of Alcea rosea seed on glutathione level of liver and pancreas in alloxan induced diabetic rat models. *p < 0.001, as compared with normal control group. **p < 0.001 as compared with diabetic group. ***p < 0.001 as compared with metformin group. Each value is a mean ± SD (n = 6 in each group). The experiments were carried out in triplicates.
Effect of aqueous and methanol extracts of Alcea rosea seed on enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant status of liver in alloxan induced diabetic rats.
| Enzymes | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | Group V | Group VI | Group VII |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR (μg GSSG utilized/min/mg of protein) | 35.9 ± 7.3 | 10.5 ± 2.3 | 27.1 ± 2.1 | 15.5 ± 1.8 | 22.5 ± 1.0 | 18.4 ± 1.3 | 24.4 ± 1.02 |
| GPx (μg GSH utilized/min/mg of protein) | 38.1 ± 4.1 | 6.2 ± 2.1 | 25.5 ± 2.01 | 11.9 ± 2.1 | 20.7 ± 1.2 | 13.3 ± 1.2 | 23.6 ± 2.04 |
| GST (nmol of CDNB conjugated/min/mg of protein) | 32.02 ± 3.5 | 17.9 ± 1.4 | 25.8 ± 1.02 | 19.06 ± 0.7 | 22.7 ± 1.8 | 20.66 ± 1.1 | 23.6 ± 2.30 |
| SOD (units/mg of protein) | 48.3 ± 4.01 | 25.05 ± 3.2 | 42.01 ± 2.08 | 30.7 ± 2.6 | 36.1 ± 1.7 | 31.4 ± 1.4 | 39.05 ± 1.5 |
| CAT (nmol H2O2 decomposed/min/mg of protein) | 2630.8 ± 187.5 | 443.6 ± 62.9 | 2134.8 ± 167.9 | 854.1 ± 119.7 | 1744.5 ± 132.5 | 1131.8 ± 84.04 | 1956.6 ± 125.2 |
The data are presented as mean ± SD and evaluated by one-way ANNOVA followed by the Bonferroni t-test to detect intergroup differences.
p < 0.01 as compared with normal control.
p < 0.01 as compared to alloxan treated group.
Non-significant as compared to alloxan group.
Effect of aqueous and methanol extracts of Alcea rosea seed on enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant status of pancreas in alloxan induced diabetic rats.
| Enzymes | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | Group V | Group VI | Group VII |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR (μg GSSG utilized/min/mg of protein) | 14.53 ± 2.2 | 6.47 ± 1.26 | 12.78 ± 0.94 | 9.18 ± 0.85 | 11.99 ± 0.85 | 9.90 ± 0.41 | 13.74 ± 0.88 |
| GPX (μg GSH utilized/min/mg of protein) | 6.13 ± 0.9 | 3.39 ± 0.48 | 5.58 ± 0.46 | 3.53 ± 0.61 | 4.57 ± 0.35 | 3.79 ± 0.33 | 5.33 ± 0.35 |
| GST (nmol of CDNB conjugated/min/mg of protein) | 118.90 ± 1.5 | 60.88 ± 2.90 | 107.70 ± 2.78 | 78.01 ± 2.54 | 96.47 ± 2.11 | 82.15 ± 2.10 | 103.1 ± 4.4 |
| SOD (units/mg protein) | 54.05 ± 3.2 | 34.54 ± 3.26 | 46.76 ± 1.83 | 37.94 ± 1.40 | 43.23 ± 2.99 | 40.29 ± 1.29 | 46.27 ± 0.83 |
| CAT (nmol H2O2 decomposed/min/mg of protein) | 2206.1 ± 78.8 | 908.1 ± 104.4 | 1779.3 ± 29.1 | 1098.1 ± 10.3 | 1578.9 ± 43.9 | 1178.1 ± 86.1 | 1689.1 ± 71.1 |
The data are presented as mean ± SD and evaluated by one-way ANNOVA followed by the Bonferroni t-test to detect inter group differences.
p < 0.01 as compared with normal group.
p < 0.01 as compared to alloxan treated group.
Non-significant as compared to normal group.
Non-significant as compared to alloxan group.