Literature DB >> 36175710

Ergonomic Assessment of the Surgeon's Physical Workload During Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Laparoscopy in a French Multicenter Randomized Trial (ROBOGYN-1004 Trial).

Judicaël Hotton1, Emilie Bogart2, Marie-Cécile Le Deley2, Eric Lambaudie3, Fabrice Narducci4, Frédéric Marchal5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard laparoscopy (SL) is responsible for musculoskeletal disorders in surgeons because of poor ergonomic positions, which could be reduced by robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) owing to the surgeons' seated position. One of the aims of the ROBOGYN-1004 study (NCT01247779) was to evaluate surgeons' workloads during real-time procedures of gynecological oncological surgery.
METHODS: Patients with gynecological cancer eligible for minimally invasive surgery were recruited from 13 French centers between December 2010 and December 2015. Physical workload was evaluated using the Borg scale every hour over the surgery duration and the perception of workload evaluated using NASA-TLX at the end of surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 369 patients were recruited, of whom 176 underwent RAL and 193 underwent SL (per-protocol analysis). Posture during SL was significantly more challenging for all body parts except the back. There was an increase in discomfort over time (up to 4 h) for the hands and arms, neck, and legs in SL compared with RAL. Perceived physical activity and abilities were rated higher in SL than in RAL (p < 0.01), whereas perceived personal performance was higher in SL (p < 0.01). Perceived physical effort during surgery was lower in RAL than in SL.
CONCLUSIONS: RAL improves the perception of physical workload. Compared with SL, the perceived effort is lower in RAL regardless of the complexity of the surgery.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36175710     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12548-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  40 in total

1.  Surgery and ergonomics.

Authors:  R Berguer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-09

2.  Inflight workload assessment: comparison of subjective and physiological measurements.

Authors:  Yung-Hui Lee; Bor-Shong Liu
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2003-10

3.  Surgeons' perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Ofer N Gofrit; Albert A Mikahail; Kevin C Zorn; Gregory P Zagaja; Gary D Steinberg; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Physical strain and urgent need for ergonomic training among gynecologic oncologists who perform minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Jason Franasiak; Emily M Ko; Juli Kidd; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Maria Bell; John F Boggess; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures.

Authors:  R Berguer; G T Rab; H Abu-Ghaida; A Alarcon; J Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 7.  Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Robert W Holloway; Sarfraz Ahmad
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Factors predictive of postoperative morbidity and cost in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sean C Dowdy; Bijan J Borah; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Sanjeev Kumar; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Lindsey R Haas; William A Cliby; Karl C Podratz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Gyusung Lee; F Jacob Seagull; Nora Meenaghan; David Dexter
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Minimal access surgery (MAS)-related surgeon morbidity syndromes.

Authors:  D A G Reyes; B Tang; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.