Literature DB >> 22136216

Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.

Robert W Holloway1, Sarfraz Ahmad.   

Abstract

Advanced laparoscopic procedures for hysterectomy and staging lymphadenectomy were not widely adopted for management of endometrial cancer despite nearly 20 years of improvements in laparoscopic technology. Many surgeons have recently embraced da Vinci robotic-assisted laparoscopy in preference to traditional laparoscopy because of its technological advantages of wristed instrumentation, high-definition 3-D optics, ergonomics and autonomy of camera control; the majority of women with endometrial cancer in the USA now undergo robotic-assisted surgery. The purpose of this article is to review the robotic surgical techniques for hysterectomy, pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy procedures, and the current comparative literature discussing perioperative outcomes. Additionally, literature that discusses challenges managing obese patients and robotic surgical costs are reviewed. Future multi-institutional, prospective registration studies comparing perioperative outcomes, complications, pain, recovery time, cost and long-term clinical outcomes with open, laparoscopic and robotic procedures will be necessary to completely appreciate the impact of robotic-assisted technology.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2011 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22136216     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01744.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  10 in total

1.  Experience implication in subjective surgical ergonomics comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries.

Authors:  V Mendes; Franck Bruyere; Jean Michel Escoffre; Aurelien Binet; Hubert Lardy; Henri Marret; Frederic Marchal; Thomas Hebert
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-12

2.  Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.

Authors:  David W Doo; C Tyler Kirkland; Lauren H Griswold; Gerald McGwin; Warner K Huh; Charles A Leath; Kenneth H Kim
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Robotic high para-aortic lymph node dissection with high port placement using same port for pelvic surgery in gynecologic cancer patients.

Authors:  Tae Joong Kim; Gun Yoon; Yoo Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong Won Lee; Duk Soo Bae; Byoung Gie Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Ergonomic Assessment of the Surgeon's Physical Workload During Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Laparoscopy in a French Multicenter Randomized Trial (ROBOGYN-1004 Trial).

Authors:  Judicaël Hotton; Emilie Bogart; Marie-Cécile Le Deley; Eric Lambaudie; Fabrice Narducci; Frédéric Marchal
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.339

5.  Robotic-assisted radical parametrectomy in patients with malignant gynecological tumors.

Authors:  Grigor A Gorchev; Slavcho T Tomov; Zdravka V Radionova; Lachezar S Tanchev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-12-04

Review 6.  Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies.

Authors:  Kiran H Clair; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.730

7.  Robotic-assisted transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy as part of staging procedure for gynaecological malignancies: single institution experience.

Authors:  V Zanagnolo; D Rollo; T Tomaselli; P G Rosenberg; L Bocciolone; F Landoni; G Aletti; M Peiretti; F Sanguineti; A Maggioni
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-08-01

8.  Obesity is associated with decreased lung compliance and hypercapnia during robotic assisted surgery.

Authors:  Dana Rodica Tomescu; Mihai Popescu; Simona Olimpia Dima; Nicolae Bacalbașa; Șerban Bubenek-Turconi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Chirag A Shah; Tiffany Beck; John B Liao; Nadia V Giannakopoulos; Dan Veljovich; Pam Paley
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Association between Obesity, Surgical Route, and Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Uterine Cancer.

Authors:  Entidhar Al Sawah; Jason L Salemi; Mitchel Hoffman; Anthony N Imudia; Emad Mikhail
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-06-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.