Literature DB >> 18342173

Surgeons' perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery.

Ofer N Gofrit1, Albert A Mikahail, Kevin C Zorn, Gregory P Zagaja, Gary D Steinberg, Arieh L Shalhav.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The biomechanical and mental strains placed on the surgeon while performing laparoscopic procedures are significantly higher compared with open surgical techniques. We undertook this study to assess the prevalence of surgeons' deleterious perceptions or injuries related to laparoscopic urologic surgery.
METHODS: Members of endourological society were mailed a questionnaire evaluating their laparoscopic experience, total number of standard laparoscopic surgeries (SLS), hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (HALS), and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (RALS) they performed. The subjects reported any neuromuscular or arthritic injuries sustained during laparoscopic surgery, and graded the degree of pain, numbness, and fatigue they experienced.
RESULTS: A total of 73 urologists completed the questionnaires. The average responder was 44 years old, had completed a median of 117 procedures, and was performing 3 laparoscopic surgeries per week. Neuromuscular or arthritic symptoms during surgery were reported by 22 responders (30%), the most common was finger paresthesia (18%). At the conclusion of HALS, 45% of the surgeons suffered from hand and wrist numbness and 37% reported pain in these areas. A significant association was observed between the risk of sustaining injury during surgery and the total number of laparoscopic procedures performed by the responder (P = 0.016). RALS was the procedure least associated with injuries, and HALS the most.
CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic operating theater is a hostile ergonomic environment. Surgeons' awareness of the common injuries associated with laparoscopic surgery and careful equipment adjustments before surgery are mandatory to minimize injury. Future improvements in instrument design according to ergonomic principles are highly warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18342173     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  20 in total

1.  [Sacropolpopexy - pro robotic].

Authors:  C Hampel; C Thomas; J W Thüroff; F Roos
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Fikre Wang; James R Korndorffer; J Bruce Dunne; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Kong; Byung-Mo Oh; Hongman Yoon; Hye Seong Ahn; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Sun Geun Chung; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Taner A Usta; Aysel Ozkaynak; Ebru Kovalak; Erdinc Ergul; M Murat Naki; Erdal Kaya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effect of a laparoscopic instrument with rotatable handle piece on biomechanical stress during laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinhilber; Robert Seibt; Florian Reiff; Monika A Rieger; Bernhard Kraemer; Ralf Rothmund
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of fatigue accumulated during and after prolonged robotic and laparoscopic surgical methods: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Manuel González-Sánchez; Ivan González-Poveda; Santiago Mera-Velasco; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Timothy A Plerhoples; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sherry M Wren
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-12-13

8.  Comparative assessment of surgeons' task performance and surgical ergonomics associated with conventional and modified flank positions: a simulation study.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Gaiqing Kong; Yisen Meng; Shutao Tan; Kunlin Wei; Qian Zhang; Jie Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotic implantation of gastric electrical stimulation electrodes for gastroparesis.

Authors:  Jon C Gould; Chirag Dholakia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Impact of novel shift handle laparoscopic tool on wrist ergonomics and task performance.

Authors:  Denny Yu; Bethany Lowndes; Missy Morrow; Kenton Kaufman; Juliane Bingener; Susan Hallbeck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.