Literature DB >> 22613351

Physical strain and urgent need for ergonomic training among gynecologic oncologists who perform minimally invasive surgery.

Jason Franasiak1, Emily M Ko, Juli Kidd, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Maria Bell, John F Boggess, Paola A Gehrig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is limited data regarding physical strain and minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIS). We sought to evaluate ergonomic strain among gynecologic oncologists.
METHODS: An online survey was sent to all physician members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology in North America in 2010. The survey contained 42 questions and data was analyzed using univariate and bivariate analyses with summary statistics, t-tests, and chi-squared test.
RESULTS: There were 260 respondents (31.2%) to the survey. Case mix was 26% benign and 64% oncologic surgery. Over 52% of respondents had been in practice for greater than 11 years and 52% practice in an academic setting. Physical discomfort related to MIS was reported in 88% (216/244) of surgeons with 52% reporting persistent pain. Increased pain symptoms were associated with surgeon's height, glove size, age and female gender. Patient body mass index (BMI) was associated with pain symptoms in surgeons performing conventional laparoscopic surgery, but not robotic surgery. To decrease pain, surgeons changed positions (78%), limited the number of cases per day (14%), spread cases throughout the week (6%), or limited the total number of cases (3%). Only 29% had received treatment at any time for pain symptoms. Treatment included physical therapy (59%), medical management (28%), surgery (13%), and time off (1%). Only 16% of those with pain symptoms had received formal ergonomic training.
CONCLUSION: Physical strain rates of 88% are far greater than previously reported. Such prevalent occupational strain presents a growing problem in the face of increasing demand for MIS.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22613351     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  16 in total

1.  Which causes more ergonomic stress: Laparoscopic or open surgery?

Authors:  Robert Wang; Zhe Liang; Ahmed M Zihni; Shuddhadeb Ray; Michael M Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgeons' physical discomfort and symptoms during robotic surgery: a comprehensive ergonomic survey study.

Authors:  G I Lee; M R Lee; I Green; M Allaf; M R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Musculoskeletal pain among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tina Dalager; Karen Søgaard; Katrine Tholstrup Bech; Ole Mogensen; Pernille Tine Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Interventionalists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sherise Epstein; Emily H Sparer; Bao N Tran; Qing Z Ruan; Jack T Dennerlein; Dhruv Singhal; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Ergonomic Assessment of the Surgeon's Physical Workload During Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Laparoscopy in a French Multicenter Randomized Trial (ROBOGYN-1004 Trial).

Authors:  Judicaël Hotton; Emilie Bogart; Marie-Cécile Le Deley; Eric Lambaudie; Fabrice Narducci; Frédéric Marchal
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Physician pain and discomfort during minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Megan E McDonald; Pedro T Ramirez; Mark F Munsell; Marilyn Greer; William M Burke; Wendel T Naumann; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.

Authors:  Natalia Povolotskaya; Robert Woolas; Dirk Brinkmann
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-15

8.  Ergonomic status of laparoscopic urologic surgery: survey results from 241 urologic surgeons in china.

Authors:  Boluo Liang; Lin Qi; Jinrui Yang; Zhenzhen Cao; Xiongbing Zu; Longfei Liu; Long Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Feasibility and acceptance of a robotic surgery ergonomic training program.

Authors:  Jason Franasiak; Renatta Craven; Prithima Mosaly; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.

Authors:  Geertje Callewaert; Jan Bosteels; Susanne Housmans; Jasper Verguts; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Frank Van der Aa; Dirk De Ridder; Ignace Vergote; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2016-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.