Literature DB >> 14556571

Inflight workload assessment: comparison of subjective and physiological measurements.

Yung-Hui Lee1, Bor-Shong Liu.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of pilot workload during flight is an important aviation safety consideration. The aim of this study was to assess inflight pilot workload using both physiological and multidimensional subjective-ratings measurements (heart rate and NASA Task Load Index, respectively), comparing relative sensitivity during the four phases of flight: take-off, cruise, approach, and landing.
METHODS: Ten male pilots volunteered to participate in the trials, which took place in a Boeing 747-400 flight simulator. Electrocardiography was performed throughout the test using the portable Cardiovis ECG system. Mean heart rate (HR) and incremental heart rate (delta HR) were considered indices of physiological workload.
RESULTS: Peak HR was observed during take-off (83.2 bpm) and landing (88.6 bpm); moreover, delta HR was also greatest (14.2 bpm and 18.8 bpm). The Task Load Index (TLX) scale revealed that mental and performance demands were essential components of workload during flight. In addition, temporal demand was an important component of workload during take-off and physical demand was significant during cruise. Analysis of correlation revealed that the delta HR is significantly related to TLX scores (r = 0.81, n = 40).
CONCLUSIONS: Management of the individual sources of stress, which tend to become predominant during different flight phases, should be emphasized in periodic recurrent training. For example, a pilot must be trained to cope with the increased temporal stresses associated with take-off. In addition, the recommendations will be concerned with maintaining vigilance, task allocation between pilots, and inflight rest during long-haul cruise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14556571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  6 in total

1.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Experience implication in subjective surgical ergonomics comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries.

Authors:  V Mendes; Franck Bruyere; Jean Michel Escoffre; Aurelien Binet; Hubert Lardy; Henri Marret; Frederic Marchal; Thomas Hebert
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-12

3.  Ergonomic Assessment of the Surgeon's Physical Workload During Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Laparoscopy in a French Multicenter Randomized Trial (ROBOGYN-1004 Trial).

Authors:  Judicaël Hotton; Emilie Bogart; Marie-Cécile Le Deley; Eric Lambaudie; Fabrice Narducci; Frédéric Marchal
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Changes in physiological parameters induced by indoor simulated driving: effect of lower body exercise at mid-term break.

Authors:  Wen Chieh Liang; John Yuan; Deh Chuan Sun; Ming Han Lin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight.

Authors:  Wenbin Li; Rong Li; Xiaoping Xie; Yaoming Chang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  The Effect of Expertise during Simulated Flight Emergencies on the Autonomic Response and Operative Performance in Military Pilots.

Authors:  Sara Santos; Jose A Parraca; Orlando Fernandes; Santos Villafaina; Vicente Javier Clemente-Suarez; Filipe Melo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.