Literature DB >> 20193893

Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic.

Adrian Park1, Gyusung Lee, F Jacob Seagull, Nora Meenaghan, David Dexter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The widely held belief that laparoscopy causes greater strain on surgeons' bodies than open surgery is not well documented in scope or magnitude. In the largest North American survey to date, we investigated the association of demographics, ergonomics, and environment and equipment with physical symptoms reported by laparoscopic surgeons. STUDY
DESIGN: There were 317 surgeons identified as involved in laparoscopic practices who completed the online survey. Data collected from this comprehensive 23-question survey were analyzed using chi-square.
RESULTS: There were 272 laparoscopic surgeons (86.9%) who reported physical symptoms or discomfort. The strongest predictor of symptoms was high case volume, with the surprising exceptions of eye and back symptoms, which were consistently reported even with low case volumes. High rates of neck, hand, and lower extremity symptoms correlated with fellowship training, which is strongly associated with high case volume. Surprisingly, symptoms were little related to age, height, or practice length. The level of surgeons' awareness of ergonomic guidelines proved to be somewhere between slightly and somewhat aware. A substantial number of respondents requested improvements in regard to both the positioning and resolution of the monitor.
CONCLUSIONS: Far beyond previous reports of 20% to 30% incidence of occupational injury, we present evidence that 87% of surgeons who regularly perform minimally invasive surgery suffer such symptoms or injuries, primarily high case load-associated. Additional data accrual and analysis are necessary, as laparoscopic procedures become more prevalent, for improvement of surgeon-patient and surgeon-technology interfaces to reverse this trend and halt the epidemic before it is upon us. Copyright 2010 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20193893     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  84 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Ergonomic assessment of the French and American position for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the MIS Suite.

Authors:  Kelvin H Kramp; Marc J van Det; Eric R Totte; Christiaan Hoff; Jean-Pierre E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee; Tameka Clanton; Tamera Clanton; Erica Sutton; Adrian E Park; Michael R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Higher physical workload risks with NOTES versus laparoscopy: a quantitative ergonomic assessment.

Authors:  Gyusung Lee; Erica Sutton; Tameka Clanton; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The road to reduced port surgery: from single big incisions to single small incisions, and beyond.

Authors:  Paul G Curcillo; Erica R Podolsky; Stephanie A King
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position.

Authors:  Yassar Youssef; Gyusung Lee; Carlos Godinez; Erica Sutton; Rosemary V Klein; Ivan M George; F Jacob Seagull; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the best approach? Frame the issue.

Authors:  Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The effect of ergonomic laparoscopic tool handle design on performance and efficiency.

Authors:  Kryztopher D Tung; Rami M Shorti; Earl C Downey; Donald S Bloswick; Andrew S Merryweather
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Experience implication in subjective surgical ergonomics comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries.

Authors:  V Mendes; Franck Bruyere; Jean Michel Escoffre; Aurelien Binet; Hubert Lardy; Henri Marret; Frederic Marchal; Thomas Hebert
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-12

Review 10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Jayapriya Jayakumaran; Sejal D Patel; Bhushan K Gangrade; Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu; Soundarya Ramanatha Pandian; Celso Silva
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.