Sushil Kar1, Arvind Tripathi2, Juhi Singh3, J Ramkumar4. 1. Professor (Prosthodontics), Saraswati Dental College & Hospital, Lucknow, India. 2. Professor & Head (Prosthodontics), Saraswati Dental College & Hospital, Lucknow, India. 3. Private Practice, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India. 4. Associate Professor (Mechanical Engineering), Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India.
Abstract
Background: The dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials has been evaluated by different methods but their reliability is still questionable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression material using 3D laser scanner. Method: In the present study, a metal die with its custom tray were designed. Using this die and tray, 10 impressions each were made from addition silicone (Aquasil LV; Dentsply), condensation silicone (Speedex coltene, Whaledent) and polyether (3M; ESPE). All the impressions were poured with Type IV die stone and total of 30 die replicas were obtained. These were scanned with a Picza 3D laser scanner (LPX 600, Roland,California) and the difference between the stone model was calculated by determining its volumetric changes using CAD-CAM pero version 2.0. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the groups, whereas significance of mean difference between the groups was done by Tukey HSD. Results: All the three groups showed mean decrease indicating a dimensional shrinkage from the master die. Mean percentage dimensional change in condensation silicone was maximum (-319.02 ±15.50) followed by polyether (-122.59 ± 0.64) and least in addition silicone (-23.83 ± 0.43). All the results were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: Picza 3D laser scanner can precisely measure the volumetric changes in all the three elastomeric impression materials.
Background: The dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials has been evaluated by different methods but their reliability is still questionable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression material using 3D laser scanner. Method: In the present study, a metal die with its custom tray were designed. Using this die and tray, 10 impressions each were made from addition silicone (Aquasil LV; Dentsply), condensation silicone (Speedex coltene, Whaledent) and polyether (3M; ESPE). All the impressions were poured with Type IV die stone and total of 30 die replicas were obtained. These were scanned with a Picza 3D laser scanner (LPX 600, Roland,California) and the difference between the stone model was calculated by determining its volumetric changes using CAD-CAM pero version 2.0. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the groups, whereas significance of mean difference between the groups was done by Tukey HSD. Results: All the three groups showed mean decrease indicating a dimensional shrinkage from the master die. Mean percentage dimensional change in condensation silicone was maximum (-319.02 ±15.50) followed by polyether (-122.59 ± 0.64) and least in addition silicone (-23.83 ± 0.43). All the results were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: Picza 3D laser scanner can precisely measure the volumetric changes in all the three elastomeric impression materials.
Authors: Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria; Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues; Ana Paula Macedo; Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro Journal: Braz Oral Res Date: 2008 Oct-Dec