Literature DB >> 1527737

Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.

S H Hung1, J H Purk, D E Tira, J D Eick.   

Abstract

This study compared the accuracy of one-step putty wash with two-step putty wash impression techniques. Five addition silicone impression materials-Mirror 3 (MR), Mirror 3 Extrude (ME), Express (E), Permagum (P), and Absolute(A)--were tested. A stainless steel model containing two full-crown abutment preparations was used as the positive control. Five replications for one-step and two-step putty wash impressions of the master model were made for each test material. Accuracy of the materials was assessed by measuring six dimensions on stone dies poured from impressions of the master model. Accuracy of addition silicone impression material is affected more by material than technique. Accuracy of the putty wash one-step impression technique was not different from the putty wash two-step impression technique except at one of the six dimensions where one-step was more accurate than two-step. Mirror 3 putty wash two-step impression presented less distortion than Mirror 3 Extrude putty wash one-step or two-step impression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1527737     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90151-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  23 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.

Authors:  Cristina Zarauz; Arelhys Valverde; Francisco Martinez-Rus; Bassam Hassan; Guillermo Pradies
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.

Authors:  Ramandeep Dugal; Bhargavi Railkar; Smita Musani
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-10-26

3.  In vivo Study of the Accuracy of Dual-arch Impressions.

Authors:  Luciana Martinelli Santayana de Lima; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Luiz Henrique Burnett Junior; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

4.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Linear Dimensional Accuracy of Four Impression Techniques using Polyether Impression Material.

Authors:  Smita Sara Manoj; K P Cherian; Vidya Chitre; Meena Aras
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-02-06

5.  Effect of the impression margin thickness on the linear accuracy of impression and stone dies: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Y G Naveen; Raghunath Patil
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-08-03

6.  An evaluation of dimensional accuracy of one-step and two-step impression technique using addition silicone impression material: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Neelam A Pande; R D Parkhedkar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-10-10

7.  Comparison of dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials using 3D laser scanner.

Authors:  Sushil Kar; Arvind Tripathi; Juhi Singh; J Ramkumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-07-30

8.  A Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Addition Silicone of Different Consistencies with Two Different Spacer Designs - In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Suprabha Rathee; B Eswaran; Ma Eswaran; R Prabhu; Kr Geetha; Gp Krishna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

9.  Dimensional Accuracy of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic VPS Impression Materials Using Different Impression Techniques - An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Sreeramulu Basapogu; Ajai Pilla; Suman Pathipaka
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

10.  Accuracy of Single-Step versus 2-Step Double-Mix Impression Technique.

Authors:  Eduardo Batista Franco; Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha; Francyle Simões Herrera; Ana Raquel Benetti
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2011-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.