Literature DB >> 6389833

Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.

J Valderhaug, F Fløystrand.   

Abstract

Elastomeric impression materials for fixed prosthodontics are considered most stable when they have an even thickness of 2 to 4 mm. To obtain this, a custom-made impression tray is recommended. The purpose of the present study was to compare the stability of impressions made in custom trays and trays made of chromium-plated brass. The impression materials chosen were polyether and silicone. Two master models of the upper jaw were made of metal. The canines and first molars represented abutment teeth with flat occlusal surfaces. An engraved cross on each surface made it possible to measure in a microscope the distances between the abutment teeth on the models and in the impressions. The accuracy of the method was within +/- 8 micron. Twelve standardized impressions were made with each impression material in the two types of trays. The distances between the abutment teeth were measured immediately on removal of the impression, and after 1 and 24 hours. Although ample amount of impression material (2 to 9 mm) was allowed, the linear dimensional stability of the impressions made in stock trays was not inferior to the stability of impressions made in custom-made trays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6389833     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90336-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of effect of tray space on the accuracy of condensation silicone, addition silicone and polyether impression materials: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Varun Kumar; Himanshu Aeran
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-06-04

2.  Comparison of dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials using 3D laser scanner.

Authors:  Sushil Kar; Arvind Tripathi; Juhi Singh; J Ramkumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-07-30

3.  Comparative evaluation of the effect of electrolyzed oxidizing water on surface detail reproduction, dimensional stability and Surface texture of poly vinyl siloxane impressions.

Authors:  A S Mahalakshmi; Vidhya Jeyapalan; Vallabh Mahadevan; Chitra Shankar Krishnan; N S Azhagarasan; Hariharan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

4.  A Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Addition Silicone of Different Consistencies with Two Different Spacer Designs - In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Suprabha Rathee; B Eswaran; Ma Eswaran; R Prabhu; Kr Geetha; Gp Krishna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

5.  In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Different Types of Impression Trays and Impression Materials on the Accuracy of Open Tray Implant Impressions: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sonam Gupta; Aparna Ichalangod Narayan; Dhanasekar Balakrishnan
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-02-27

6.  Comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of impression materials from developing countries and developed countries after disinfection with different immersion disinfectant systems and ultraviolet chamber.

Authors:  Rupandeep Kaur Samra; Shreenivas Vasant Bhide
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-12-13

7.  Effect of multiple pouring on the accuracy of casts made using 3D-printed custom trays with different spacer thicknesses: A research study.

Authors:  Sara Tavakolizadeh; Mohammad Javad Razaghi; Pedram Pakravan; Majid Sedaghat Monfared; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Rahab Ghoveizi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2020

8.  Effect of cervical relining of acrylic resin copings on the accuracy of stone dies obtained using a polyether impression material.

Authors:  André Tomazini Gomes de Sá; César Antunes de Freitas; Fátima Cristina de Sá; Wagner José Silva Ursi; Tânia Christina Simões; Márcia Furtado Antunes de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.