Literature DB >> 20877972

Linear dimensional changes in plaster die models using different elastomeric materials.

Jefferson Ricardo Pereira1, Karina Yumi Murata, Accácio Lins do Valle, Janaina Salomon Ghizoni, Fábio Kenji Shiratori.   

Abstract

Dental impression is an important step in the preparation of prostheses since it provides the reproduction of anatomic and surface details of teeth and adjacent structures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the linear dimensional alterations in gypsum dies obtained with different elastomeric materials, using a resin coping impression technique with individual shells. A master cast made of stainless steel with fixed prosthesis characteristics with two prepared abutment teeth was used to obtain the impressions. References points (A, B, C, D, E and F) were recorded on the occlusal and buccal surfaces of abutments to register the distances. The impressions were obtained using the following materials: polyether, mercaptan-polysulfide, addition silicone, and condensation silicone. The transfer impressions were made with custom trays and an irreversible hydrocolloid material and were poured with type IV gypsum. The distances between identified points in gypsum dies were measured using an optical microscope and the results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (p < 0.05) and Tukey's test. The mean of the distances were registered as follows: addition silicone (AB = 13.6 µm, CD=15.0 µm, EF = 14.6 µm, GH=15.2 µm), mercaptan-polysulfide (AB = 36.0 µm, CD = 36.0 µm, EF = 39.6 µm, GH = 40.6 µm), polyether (AB = 35.2 µm, CD = 35.6 µm, EF = 39.4 µm, GH = 41.4 µm) and condensation silicone (AB = 69.2 µm, CD = 71.0 µm, EF = 80.6 µm, GH = 81.2 µm). All of the measurements found in gypsum dies were compared to those of a master cast. The results demonstrated that the addition silicone provides the best stability of the compounds tested, followed by polyether, polysulfide and condensation silicone. No statistical differences were obtained between polyether and mercaptan-polysulfide materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20877972     DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000300013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials using 3D laser scanner.

Authors:  Sushil Kar; Arvind Tripathi; Juhi Singh; J Ramkumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-07-30

2.  Influence of chloramine-T disinfection on elastomeric impression stability.

Authors:  Ricardo Danil Guiraldo; Sandrine Bittencourt Berger; Marilia Franco Punhagui; Thais Staut Moretto; Murilo Baena Lopes; Alcides Gonini-Júnior; Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

3.  Comparing the Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials in Making Duplicate Dies.

Authors:  Farshad Bajoghli; Mahmoud Sabouhi; Saeid Nosouhian; Amin Davoudi; Zeynab Behnamnia
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-07

4.  Dimensional Stability of a Preliminary Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Material.

Authors:  Francisco Martins; José Reis; Ignacio Barbero Navarro; Paulo Maurício
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.