Literature DB >> 3608422

Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): I. Pure tones.

Robert J Dooling1, Susan D Brown, Thomas J Park, Kazuo Okanoya, Sigfrid D Soli.   

Abstract

A new combination of operant conditioning and psychophysical scaling procedures was used to study auditory perception in a small bird. In a same-different discrimination task, budgerigars learned to discriminate among pure tones that varied along one or more acoustic dimensions. Response latencies were used to generate a matrix of interstimulus similarities. Multidimensional scaling procedures were used to arrange these acoustic stimuli in a multidimensional space that supposedly reflects the bird's perceptual organization. For tones that varied in intensity, duration, and frequency simultaneously, budgerigars were much more sensitive to frequency changes. From a set of tones that varied only in intensity, it was possible to calculate the growth of loudness with intensity for the budgerigar. For tones that varied only in frequency, budgerigars showed evidence of an "acoustic fovea" for frequency change in the spectral region of 2-4 kHz. Budgerigars and humans also differed in their perceptual grouping of tone sequences that rise, fall, or remain constant in pitch. Surprisingly, budgerigars were much less responsive to pitch contour than were humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3608422     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.101.2.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  10 in total

1.  Acoustic and perceptual categories of vocal elements in the warble song of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Edward W Smith; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Comprehension of "absence" by an African Grey parrot: Learning with respect to questions of same/different.

Authors:  I M Pepperberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Do ferrets perceive relative pitch?

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Learned vocalizations in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the relationship between contact calls and warble song.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Michael S Osmanski; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Duration discrimination in the mouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Perceptual organization of auditory temporal patterns in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  R F Braaten; S H Hulse
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-11

8.  Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): spoken vowels.

Authors:  R J Dooling; S D Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

9.  Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the voiced-voiceless distinction.

Authors:  R J Dooling; K Okanoya; S D Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-07

10.  Auditory same/different concept learning and generalization in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele; Robert G Cook; Lauren M Guillette; Allison H Hahn; Christopher B Sturdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.