Literature DB >> 20329865

Do ferrets perceive relative pitch?

Pingbo Yin1, Jonathan B Fritz, Shihab A Shamma.   

Abstract

The existence of relative pitch perception in animals is difficult to demonstrate, since unlike humans, animals often attend to absolute rather than relative properties of sound elements. However, the results of the present study show that ferrets can be trained using relative pitch to discriminate two-tone sequences (rising vs. falling). Three ferrets were trained using a positive-reinforcement paradigm in which sequences of reference (one to five repeats) and target stimuli were presented, and animals were rewarded only when responding correctly to the target. The training procedure consisted of three training phases that successively shaped the ferrets to attend to relative pitch. In Phase-1 training, animals learned the basic task with sequences of invariant tone-pairs and could use absolute pitch information. During Phase-2 training, in order to emphasize relative cues, absolute pitch was varied each trial within a two-octave frequency range. In Phase-3 training, absolute pitch cues were removed, and only relative cue information was available to solve the task. Two ferrets successfully completed training on all three phases and achieved significant discriminative performance over the trained four-octave frequency range. These results suggest that ferrets can be trained to discern the relative pitch relationship of a sequence of tone-pairs independent of frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20329865      PMCID: PMC2856516          DOI: 10.1121/1.3290988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Music perception and octave generalization in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  A A Wright; J J Rivera; S H Hulse; M Shyan; J J Neiworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-09

2.  Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan Fritz; Shihab Shamma; Mounya Elhilali; David Klein
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Macaque monkeys discriminate pitch relationships.

Authors:  Michael Brosch; Elena Selezneva; Cornelia Bucks; Henning Scheich
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-04

4.  Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.

Authors:  W J Dowling; D S Fujitani
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Reaction-time distributions in the detection of weak signals in noise.

Authors:  E C Carterette; M P Friedman; R Cosmides
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; W J Dowling
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Infants' perception of melodies: the role of melodic contour.

Authors:  S E Trehub; D Bull; L A Thorpe
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1984-06

8.  The perceptual reality of tone chroma in early infancy.

Authors:  L Demany; F Armand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitch discrimination by ferrets for simple and complex sounds.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jan W H Schnupp; Sheelah M B Hart-Schnupp; Andrew J King; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effect of temporal separation on tone-sequence discrimination in monkeys.

Authors:  Akihiro Izumi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  21 in total

1.  A quantitative analysis of information about past and present stimuli encoded by spikes of A1 neurons.

Authors:  Stefan Klampfl; Stephen V David; Pingbo Yin; Shihab A Shamma; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Relative salience of spectral and temporal features in auditory long-term memory.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Shihab A Shamma; Jonathan B Fritz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Rapid spectrotemporal plasticity in primary auditory cortex during behavior.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Stimulus-dependent flexibility in non-human auditory pitch processing.

Authors:  Micah R Bregman; Aniruddh D Patel; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-09-10

Review 5.  How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Behavioral measures of auditory streaming in ferrets (Mustela putorius).

Authors:  Ling Ma; Christophe Micheyl; Pingbo Yin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Behavioral sensitivity to broadband binaural localization cues in the ferret.

Authors:  Peter Keating; Fernando R Nodal; Kohilan Gananandan; Andreas L Schulz; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-25

8.  Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.

Authors:  Karin L Akre; Ximena Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Effect of acoustic similarity on short-term auditory memory in the monkey.

Authors:  Brian H Scott; Mortimer Mishkin; Pingbo Yin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Detecting changes in dynamic and complex acoustic environments.

Authors:  Yves Boubenec; Jennifer Lawlor; Urszula Górska; Shihab Shamma; Bernhard Englitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.