Literature DB >> 21476684

Learned vocalizations in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the relationship between contact calls and warble song.

Hsiao-Wei Tu1, Michael S Osmanski, Robert J Dooling.   

Abstract

The budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) has an extraordinarily complex, learned, vocal repertoire consisting of both the long rambling warble song of males and a number of short calls produced by both sexes. In warble, the most common elements (>30%) bear a strong resemblance to the highly frequency-modulated, learned contact calls that the birds produce as single utterances. However, aside from this apparent similarity, little else is known about the relationship between contact calls and warble call elements. Here, both types of calls were recorded from four male budgerigars. Signal analysis and psychophysical testing procedures showed that the acoustic features of these two vocalizations were acoustically different and perceived as distinctive vocalizations by birds. This suggests that warble call elements are not simple insertions of contact calls but are most likely different acoustic elements, created de novo, and used solely in warble. Results show that, like contact calls, warble call elements contain information about signaler identity. The fact that contact calls and warble call elements are acoustically and perceptually distinct suggests that they probably represent two phonological systems in the budgerigar vocal repertoire, both of which arise by production learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21476684      PMCID: PMC3087398          DOI: 10.1121/1.3557035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Dynamics of the vocal imitation process: how a zebra finch learns its song.

Authors:  O Tchernichovski; P P Mitra; T Lints; F Nottebohm
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The different roles of social learning in vocal communication.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Recovery of hearing and vocal behavior after hair-cell regeneration.

Authors:  R J Dooling; B M Ryals; K Manabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Male vocal imitation produces call convergence during pair bonding in budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Obtaining acoustic similarity measures from animals: a method for species comparisons.

Authors:  K Okanoya; R J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Vocal learning in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): effects of an acoustic reference on vocal matching.

Authors:  Kazuchika Manabe; Robert J Dooling; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Vocal plasticity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for social factors in the learning of contact calls.

Authors:  S M Farabaugh; A Linzenbold; R J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Stimulation of ovarian development and egg laying by male courtship vocalization in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  B F Brockway
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  The effect of altered auditory feedback on control of vocal production in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals.

Authors:  Robert J Dooling; Thomas J Park; Susan D Brown; Kazuo Okanoya; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  6 in total

1.  Perception of warble song in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for special processing.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Neural FoxP2 and FoxP1 expression in the budgerigar, an avian species with adult vocal learning.

Authors:  Erina Hara; Jemima M Perez; Osceola Whitney; Qianqian Chen; Stephanie A White; Timothy F Wright
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Neural correlates of behavioral amplitude modulation sensitivity in the budgerigar midbrain.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Erikson G Neilans; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Is consonance attractive to budgerigars? No evidence from a place preference study.

Authors:  Bernhard Wagner; Daniel L Bowling; Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Constraints on vocal production learning in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Yoshimasa Seki; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Sex Differences in Rhythmic Preferences in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus): A Comparative Study with Humans.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele; Daniel L Bowling
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.