Literature DB >> 15480703

Duration discrimination in the mouse (Mus musculus).

Karin B Klink1, Georg M Klump.   

Abstract

Detection thresholds for an increment in duration of a 10-kHz pure tone were determined in the NMRI mouse using a Go/NoGo-procedure and the method of constant stimuli. Thresholds for reference durations of 50, 100 and 200 ms were obtained presenting the signals at a fixed level or at a level varying by +/-3 dB. Thresholds were determined using signal-detection theory ( d'=1.0 or d'=1.8) and the criterion of 50% correct responses. For a fixed level, the average Weber fraction Delta T/ T (criterion of d'=1.8) significantly decreased from 1.18 or 1.23 at reference durations of 50 or 100 ms, respectively, to 0.97 at a reference duration of 200 ms. Thresholds were on average reduced by 46.8 or 55.4% for the threshold criteria d'=1 or 50% correct responses, respectively. There was no effect of randomizing the level on the discrimination threshold. Duration discrimination in the NMRI mouse does not follow Weber's law. The results are consistent with a mechanism summing up neural impulses over the duration of the stimulus. The psychoacoustic data are compared with results obtained by Brand et al. (J Acoust Soc Am 51:1291-1223, 2000) on the representation of acoustic signal duration in the mouse inferior colliculus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480703     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-004-0561-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  22 in total

1.  Duration tuning in the mouse auditory midbrain.

Authors:  A Brand; R Urban; B Grothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of stimulus duration on responses of neurons in the chinchilla inferior colliculus.

Authors:  G D Chen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination, and the form of the loudness function.

Authors:  S Buus; M Florentine; T Poulsen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts.

Authors:  S M Abel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Optimal timing and the Weber function.

Authors:  P R Killeen; N A Weiss
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Auditory duration discrimination in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  R J Dooling; R J Haskell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory duration discrimination in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  E H Maier; G M Klump
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neural measurement of sound duration: control by excitatory-inhibitory interactions in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J H Casseday; D Ehrlich; E Covey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural tuning for sound duration: role of inhibitory mechanisms in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J H Casseday; D Ehrlich; E Covey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Time-critical integration of formants for perception of communication calls in mice.

Authors:  Diana B Geissler; Günter Ehret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  Understanding the neurophysiological basis of auditory abilities for social communication: a perspective on the value of ethological paradigms.

Authors:  Sharath Bennur; Joji Tsunada; Yale E Cohen; Robert C Liu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Precise detection of direct glomerular input duration by the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Anan Li; David H Gire; Thomas Bozza; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Decoding stimulus duration from neural responses in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Brandon Aubie; Riziq Sayegh; Thane Fremouw; Ellen Covey; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Frequency difference limens and auditory cue trading in CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Kelly E Radziwon; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  A novel behavioral paradigm to assess multisensory processing in mice.

Authors:  Justin K Siemann; Christopher L Muller; Gary Bamberger; John D Allison; Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  In-air hearing of the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo).

Authors:  Alyssa Maxwell; Kirstin Anderson Hansen; Sara Torres Ortiz; Ole Næsbye Larsen; Ursula Siebert; Magnus Wahlberg
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Slow NMDA-Mediated Excitation Accelerates Offset-Response Latencies Generated via a Post-Inhibitory Rebound Mechanism.

Authors:  Ezhilarasan Rajaram; Carina Kaltenbach; Matthew J Fischl; Leander Mrowka; Olga Alexandrova; Benedikt Grothe; Matthias H Hennig; Conny Kopp-Scheinpflug
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-06-18

8.  Activity-dependent formation of a vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter gradient in the superior olivary complex of NMRI mice.

Authors:  Lena Ebbers; Maren Weber; Hans Gerd Nothwang
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Frequency response areas of neurons in the mouse inferior colliculus. III. Time-domain responses: Constancy, dynamics, and precision in relation to spectral resolution, and perception in the time domain.

Authors:  Marina A Egorova; Alexander G Akimov; Gleb D Khorunzhii; Günter Ehret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.