Literature DB >> 2367177

Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): spoken vowels.

R J Dooling1, S D Brown.   

Abstract

Discrimination of natural, sustained vowels was studied in 5 budgerigars. The birds were trained using operant conditioning procedures on a same-different task, which was structured so that response latencies would provide a measure of stimulus similarity. These response latencies were used to construct similarity matrices, which were then analyzed by multidimensional scaling (MDS) procedures. MDS produced spatial maps of these speech sounds where perceptual similarity was represented by spatial proximity. The results of the three experiments suggest that budgerigars perceive natural, spoken vowels according to phonetic categories, find the acoustic differences among different talkers less salient than the acoustic differences among vowel categories, and use formant frequencies in making these complex discriminations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2367177     DOI: 10.3758/bf03203109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  20 in total

1.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: discrimination of sustained /a/ and /i/.

Authors:  C K Burdick; J D Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Perceptual structure of monophthongs and diphthongs in English.

Authors:  R A Fox
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1983 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Automatic speech recognition using psychoacoustic models.

Authors:  E Zwicker; E Terhardt; E Paulus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency selectivity in bird and man: a comparison among critical ratios, critical bands and psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  J C Saunders; W F Rintelmann; G R Bock
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): III. Contact calls.

Authors:  Susan D Brown; Robert J Dooling; Kevin E O'Grady
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Perception of vocal signals by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  R J Dooling
Journal:  Exp Biol       Date:  1986

8.  Nonsimultaneous auditory masking in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  R J Dooling; M H Searcy
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Detection and discrimination of synthetic English vowels by Old World monkeys (Cercopithecus, Macaca) and humans.

Authors:  J M Sinnott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals.

Authors:  Robert J Dooling; Thomas J Park; Susan D Brown; Kazuo Okanoya; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  19 in total

1.  Acoustic and perceptual categories of vocal elements in the warble song of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Edward W Smith; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Sound sensitivity of neurons in rat hippocampus during performance of a sound-guided task.

Authors:  Pavel M Itskov; Ekaterina Vinnik; Christian Honey; Jan Schnupp; Mathew E Diamond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Midbrain Synchrony to Envelope Structure Supports Behavioral Sensitivity to Single-Formant Vowel-Like Sounds in Noise.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams; Johanna Forst; Matthew J Mender; Erikson G Neilans; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-20

5.  Zebra finches exhibit speaker-independent phonetic perception of human speech.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Arike Gill; Caroline A A Van Heijningen; Gabriel J L Beckers; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Persistent Auditory Nerve Damage Following Kainic Acid Excitotoxicity in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

7.  Mismatch brain response to speech sound changes in rats.

Authors:  Mustak Ahmed; Tanel Mällo; Paavo H T Leppänen; Jarmo Hämäläinen; Laura Ayräväinen; Timo Ruusuvirta; Piia Astikainen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-28

8.  Zebra finches and Dutch adults exhibit the same cue weighting bias in vowel perception.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Paola Escudero; Karin Lammers; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Auditory stimuli elicit hippocampal neuronal responses during sleep.

Authors:  Ekaterina Vinnik; Sergey Antopolskiy; Pavel M Itskov; Mathew E Diamond
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-27

10.  A general auditory bias for handling speaker variability in speech? Evidence in humans and songbirds.

Authors:  Buddhamas Kriengwatana; Paola Escudero; Anne H Kerkhoven; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.