Literature DB >> 22142040

Acoustic and perceptual categories of vocal elements in the warble song of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Hsiao-Wei Tu1, Edward W Smith, Robert J Dooling.   

Abstract

The warble songs of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) are composed of a number of complex, variable acoustic elements that are sung by male birds in intimate courtship contexts for periods lasting up to several minutes. If these variable acoustic elements can be assigned to distinct acoustic-perceptual categories, it provides the opportunity to explore whether birds are perceptually sensitive to the proportion or sequential combination of warble elements belonging to different categories. By the inspection of spectrograms and by listening to recordings, humans assigned the acoustic elements in budgerigar warble from several birds to eight broad, overlapping categories. A neural-network program was developed and trained on these warble elements to simulate human categorization. The classification reliability between human raters and between human raters and the neural network classifier was better than 80% both within and across birds. Using operant conditioning and a psychophysical task, budgerigars were tested on large sets of these elements from different acoustic categories and different individuals. The birds consistently showed high discriminability for pairs of warble elements drawn from between acoustic categories and low discriminability for pairs drawn from within acoustic categories. With warble elements reliably assigned to different acoustic categories by humans and birds, it affords the opportunity to ask questions about the ordering of elements in natural warble streams and the perceptual significance of this ordering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22142040      PMCID: PMC4497543          DOI: 10.1037/a0024396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  30 in total

Review 1.  What songbirds teach us about learning.

Authors:  Michael S Brainard; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Perception of distance calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata): assessing species-specific advantages.

Authors:  K Okanoya; R J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Unsupervised bird song syllable classification using evolving neural networks.

Authors:  Louis Ranjard; Howard A Ross
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels?

Authors:  P Marler
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.548

5.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

6.  Automated categorization of bioacoustic signals: avoiding perceptual pitfalls.

Authors:  Volker B Deecke; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Using an artificial neural network to classify black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) call note types.

Authors:  Michael R W Dawson; Isabelle Charrier; Christopher B Sturdy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Zebra finches exhibit speaker-independent phonetic perception of human speech.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Arike Gill; Caroline A A Van Heijningen; Gabriel J L Beckers; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 10.  Vocal learning in birds and humans.

Authors:  Linda Wilbrecht; Fernando Nottebohm
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  8 in total

1.  Cognition, personality, and stress in budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus.

Authors:  Angela Medina-García; Jodie M Jawor; Timothy F Wright
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 2.  Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus.

Authors:  Arik Kershenbaum; Daniel T Blumstein; Marie A Roch; Çağlar Akçay; Gregory Backus; Mark A Bee; Kirsten Bohn; Yan Cao; Gerald Carter; Cristiane Cäsar; Michael Coen; Stacy L DeRuiter; Laurance Doyle; Shimon Edelman; Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho; Todd M Freeberg; Ellen C Garland; Morgan Gustison; Heidi E Harley; Chloé Huetz; Melissa Hughes; Julia Hyland Bruno; Amiyaal Ilany; Dezhe Z Jin; Michael Johnson; Chenghui Ju; Jeremy Karnowski; Bernard Lohr; Marta B Manser; Brenda McCowan; Eduardo Mercado; Peter M Narins; Alex Piel; Megan Rice; Roberta Salmi; Kazutoshi Sasahara; Laela Sayigh; Yu Shiu; Charles Taylor; Edgar E Vallejo; Sara Waller; Veronica Zamora-Gutierrez
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-11-26

3.  Budgerigars and zebra finches differ in how they generalize in an artificial grammar learning experiment.

Authors:  Michelle J Spierings; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Perception of warble song in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for special processing.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Dimensionally Specific Attention Capture in Birds Performing Auditory Streaming Task.

Authors:  Huaizhen Cai; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  Does audience affect the structure of warble song in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)?

Authors:  Cole Tobin; Angela Medina-García; Gregory M Kohn; Timothy F Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Attention capture in birds performing an auditory streaming task.

Authors:  Huaizhen Cai; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Universal principles underlying segmental structures in parrot song and human speech.

Authors:  Dan C Mann; W Tecumseh Fitch; Hsiao-Wei Tu; Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.