Literature DB >> 3606947

What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial.

L Tabár, G Faberberg, N E Day, L Holmberg.   

Abstract

Further results are presented from the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. The reduction in the rate of advanced cancers and of breast cancer mortality in the group allocated to screening when compared to the control group has accelerated with a further year of follow-up. Mortality due to other causes and the rate of other cancers remains similar in the two groups. Attention has been focused on the rate at which cancers start re-emerging among women with negative mammograms. Among women over 50 years of age at entry to the study, relatively few interval cancers are seen in the first two years after a screening test; in the third year the rate rises to nearly 50% of the comparable rate in the control group. Among women aged 40-49 years at entry, by contrast, the rate of interval cancers even in the first post screening year is nearly 40% of that in the controls and in the second year nearly 70%. In older women in the group allocated to screening, much of the breast cancer mortality comes from the refusers and little from the interval cancers; in younger women the picture is reversed. The implications for screening policy, including the interscreening interval are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3606947      PMCID: PMC2001715          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1987.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  8 in total

1.  Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; F Sturmans; N E Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study.

Authors:  H J Collette; N E Day; J J Rombach; F de Waard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Estimation of the duration of a pre-clinical disease state using screening data.

Authors:  S D Walter; N E Day
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Significant reduction in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden.

Authors:  L Tabár; A Gad; L Holmberg; U Ljungquist
Journal:  Diagn Imaging Clin Med       Date:  1985

6.  Radiographic screening for breast carcinoma. III. Appearance of carcinoma and number of projections to be used at screening.

Authors:  I Andersson
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1981

7.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Survival in breast cancer diagnosed between mammographic screening examinations.

Authors:  L H Holmberg; L Tabar; H O Adami; R Bergström
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-07-05       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  47 in total

1.  Specificity of screening in United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-08

Review 2.  Quantitative approaches to the evaluation of screening programs.

Authors:  N E Day
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Cancer screening in older adults.

Authors:  J M Walsh
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-05

Review 4.  Early detection of breast cancer: mammography.

Authors:  C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Evaluation by Markov chain models of a non-randomised breast cancer screening programme in women aged under 50 years in Sweden.

Authors:  H H Chen; E Thurfjell; S W Duffy; L Tabar
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Prevention in family practice: Consensus statement from the front line.

Authors:  G Satenstein; J Lemelin; C Folkerson; K A Scott; W E Hogg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  A comparative audit of prevalent, incident and interval cancers in the Avon breast screening programme.

Authors:  P A Sylvester; M N Vipond; E Kutt; J D Davies; A J Webb; J R Farndon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Jane Lange; Jeroen J van den Broek; Christoph I Lee; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Dominique Ritley; Karla Kerlikowske; Joshua J Fenton; Joy Melnikow; Harry J de Koning; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit.

Authors:  L Tabar; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?

Authors:  D Giorgi; E Paci; M Zappa; M Rosselli del Turco
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.