Literature DB >> 9764285

Evaluation by Markov chain models of a non-randomised breast cancer screening programme in women aged under 50 years in Sweden.

H H Chen1, E Thurfjell, S W Duffy, L Tabar.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To apply Markov chain models that have previously been used on data in randomised trials of breast cancer screening to data from an uncontrolled service screening programme; to compare results with those from a randomised trial.
DESIGN: A service screening programme in Uppsala county, Sweden, inviting 25,660 women aged 39-49 to mammographic screening every 20 months, and the Swedish Two-County Trial inviting 19,844 women aged 40-49 to two yearly screening, compared with 15,604 women of the same age in an unscreened control group. Data were analysed using Markov chain models and quasi-likelihood estimation procedures. MAIN
RESULTS: The results with respect to parameters of disease progression were very similar between the two studies. Use of estimated progression rates to predict the effect on mortality ranged from a 10% to a 17% reduction in breast cancer mortality in the Two-County Study and predicted a 15% reduction in the Uppsala programme. These compare well with the observed mortality reduction of 13% in the Two-County Trial.
CONCLUSIONS: The screening in the Uppsala programme is likely to have a similar effect to that observed in the Two-County Trial. It is feasible to evaluate non-randomised service screening programmes using Markov chain models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9764285      PMCID: PMC1756714          DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.5.329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  11 in total

1.  Periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer.

Authors:  S Shapiro; P Strax; L Venet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1971-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Breast cancer survival rates with mammographic screening: similar favorable survival rates for women younger and those older than 50 years.

Authors:  E L Thurfjell; J A Lindgren
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials.

Authors:  L Nyström; L E Rutqvist; S Wall; A Lindgren; M Lindqvist; S Rydén; I Andersson; N Bjurstam; G Fagerberg; J Frisell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: estimation procedures from mass screening programmes.

Authors:  N E Day; S D Walter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial.

Authors:  L Tabar; G Fagerberg; H H Chen; S W Duffy; C R Smart; A Gad; R A Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Tumour development, histology and grade of breast cancers: prognosis and progression.

Authors:  L Tabar; G Fagerberg; H H Chen; S W Duffy; A Gad
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1996-05-16       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Estimation of mean sojourn time in breast cancer screening using a Markov chain model of both entry to and exit from the preclinical detectable phase.

Authors:  S W Duffy; H H Chen; L Tabar; N E Day
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Screening for breast cancer in women aged under 50: mode of detection, incidence, fatality, and histology.

Authors:  L Tabar; G Fagerberg; H H Chen; S W Duffy; A Gad
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial.

Authors:  L Tabár; G Faberberg; N E Day; L Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  DCIS, cytokeratins, and the theory of the sick lobe.

Authors:  Tibor Tot
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Validation of a modelling approach for estimating the likely effectiveness of cancer screening using cancer data on prevalence screening and incidence.

Authors:  Nora Pashayan; Paul Pharoah; László Tabár; David E Neal; Richard M Martin; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Parameter estimates for invasive breast cancer progression in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  S Taghipour; D Banjevic; A B Miller; N Montgomery; A K S Jardine; B J Harvey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Quantifying the natural history of breast cancer.

Authors:  K H X Tan; L Simonella; H L Wee; A Roellin; Y-W Lim; W-Y Lim; K S Chia; M Hartman; A R Cook
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.