Literature DB >> 3896614

Significant reduction in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden.

L Tabár, A Gad, L Holmberg, U Ljungquist.   

Abstract

A population-based, randomized, controlled breast cancer screening trial with single-view mammography as the only means of primary detection has been under way in Kopparberg county, Sweden, since October 1977. The 7-year results of the study show (1) a significant change in the stage distribution of breast cancers in the cohort invited to undergo screening (ASP) as compared to the control group. (2) This change is seen as an initial decrease in the proportion of advanced (stage II and more advanced) cancers in the ASP as compared to the control population, followed in the second and third round of screening by a significant decrease in the absolute number of these advanced cancers in the ASP relative to the control group. (3) A thorough follow-up of both populations will answer whether these preliminary findings will result in decreased breast cancer mortality in the population invited to screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3896614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Imaging Clin Med        ISSN: 0254-881X


  13 in total

1.  Racial/ethnic differences in the self-reported use of screening mammography.

Authors:  Alma R Jones; Lee S Caplan; Mary Kidd Davis
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-10

2.  How valid are mammography self-reports?

Authors:  E S King; B K Rimer; B Trock; A Balshem; P Engstrom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older.

Authors:  B K Rimer; N Resch; E King; E Ross; C Lerman; A Boyce; H Kessler; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Bahcesehir long-term population-based screening compared to National Breast Cancer Registry Data: effectiveness of screening in an emerging country.

Authors:  Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Ayse Nilufer Ozaydın; Erkin Aribal; Beyza Ozcinar; Neslihan Cabioglu; Cennet Sahin; Vahit Ozmen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Diana L Miglioretti; Lisa M Reisch; Mary B Barton; William Kreuter; Cindy L Christiansen; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The Stockholm breast cancer screening trial--5-year results and stage at discovery.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; U Glas; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Using physician correspondence and postcard reminders to promote mammography use.

Authors:  S H Taplin; C Anderman; L Grothaus; S Curry; D Montano
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Randomized study of mammography screening--preliminary report on mortality in the Stockholm trial.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; E Lidbrink; L E Rutqvist; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.