Literature DB >> 6955542

Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

S Shapiro, W Venet, P Strax, L Venet, R Roeser.   

Abstract

Results from the randomized trial conducted by the Health Insurance Plan (HIP) to determine the efficacy of breast cancer screening with mammography and palpation are reported for longer periods than previously available. By the end of 10 years after entry, the study group's mortality due to breast cancer was about 30% below the control group's. Arithmetic gains due to screening were maintained through year 14; relative gains declined. With increases in the period of follow-up, cumulative survival rates among cases detected by mammography alone (palpation negative during screening), decreased more rapidly than rates among other subgroups, but survival rates for mammography cases remained relatively high. Study women aged 40-49 years at entry began to show lower breast cancer mortality than those in the control group as duration of follow-up increased. Reservations are advanced about the acceptance of this finding as evidence of the efficacy of screening under age 50 under the conditions of the HIP study. The reservations are based on the observation that the decrease of mortality among the study group aged 45-49 at entry is concentrated entirely among cases diagnosed after they reached 50 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6955542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  180 in total

1.  Mammography in New Hampshire: characteristics of the women and the exams they receive.

Authors:  P A Carney; M E Goodrich; D M O'Mahony; A N Tosteson; M S Eliassen; S P Poplack; S Birnbaum; B G Harwood; K A Burgess; B T Berube; W S Wells; J P Ball; M M Stevens
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

Review 2.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Evaluation of diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  J André Knottnerus; Chris van Weel; Jean W M Muris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-23

4.  How effective is screening for breast cancer?

Authors:  L Nyström
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

5.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Kate M Brett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Management of breast cancer: what do I tell the patient?

Authors:  C J Wright
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Health insurance and mammography: would a Medicare buy-in take us to universal screening?

Authors:  Donald H Taylor; Lynn Van Scoyoc; Sarah Tropman Hawley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Leading the way in breast cancer screening and prevention.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  How valid are mammography self-reports?

Authors:  E S King; B K Rimer; B Trock; A Balshem; P Engstrom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  Screening for colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: dubious benefits and high costs.

Authors:  S Gyde
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.