Literature DB >> 2658350

Quantitative approaches to the evaluation of screening programs.

N E Day.   

Abstract

The evaluation of screening programs for cancer is considered. Initial evaluation has to be in terms of mortality, but increasing importance should be attached to measures which evaluate the interaction of early detection with the disease process. These include the degree to which diagnosis is advanced, both in time and in stage of disease, and the ability of the screening test to identify presymptomatic lesions. Randomized trials are of major importance in establishing--in quantitative terms--the benefits of screening; in their absence, case-control methods can be adapted for this purpose, but cannot provide evidence of the same rigor. Currently, only screening for breast cancer and cervical cancer have been fully demonstrated to be effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2658350     DOI: 10.1007/bf01671147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  Case-control studies for the evaluation of screening.

Authors:  A J Sasco; N E Day; S D Walter
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

2.  Cervical cancer screening in Iceland: a case-control study.

Authors:  G Geirsson; R Kristiansdottir; K Sigurdsson; S Moss; H Tulinius
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1986

3.  UICC workshop of the Project on Evaluation of Screening Programmes for Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Authors:  J Chamberlain; N E Day; M Hakama; A B Miller; P C Prorok
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1986-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study.

Authors:  H J Collette; N E Day; J J Rombach; F de Waard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Does screening by "Pap" smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study.

Authors:  E A Clarke; T W Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-07-07       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Some results of screening for early lung cancer.

Authors:  W F Taylor; R S Fontana; M A Uhlenhopp; C S Davis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: estimation procedures from mass screening programmes.

Authors:  N E Day; S D Walter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  "Pap" smear and the risk of cervical neoplasia: quantitative estimates from a case-control study.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; S Franceschi; A Decarli; M Fasoli; A Gentile; G Tognoni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial.

Authors:  L Tabár; G Faberberg; N E Day; L Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City.

Authors:  Sharon Stein Merkin; Lori Stevenson; Neil Powe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Association between persistence with mammography screening and stage at diagnosis among elderly women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Gastric cancer: a curable disease in Britain.

Authors:  H M Sue-Ling; D Johnston; I G Martin; M F Dixon; M R Lansdown; M J McMahon; A T Axon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.