| Literature DB >> 35985974 |
Fan Yang1, Xiao-Lan Jiang2, Akash Tariq3, Sehrish Sadia4, Zeeshan Ahmed5, Jordi Sardans6, Muhammad Aleem4, Riaz Ullah7, Rainer W Bussmann8.
Abstract
At present, a variety of vaccines have been approved, and existing antiviral drugs are being tested to find an effective treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, no standardized treatment has yet been approved by the World Health Organization. The virally encoded chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which facilitates the replication of SARS-CoV in the host cells, is one potential pharmacological target for the development of anti-SARS drugs. Online search engines, such as Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus and PubMed, were used to retrieve data on the traditional uses of medicinal plants and their inhibitory effects against the SARS-CoV 3CLpro. Various pure compounds, including polyphenols, terpenoids, chalcones, alkaloids, biflavonoids, flavanones, anthraquinones and glycosides, have shown potent inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro activity with 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values ranging from 2-44 µg/mL. Interestingly, most of these active compounds, including xanthoangelol E (isolated from Angelica keiskei), dieckol 1 (isolated from Ecklonia cava), amentoflavone (isolated from Torreya nucifera), celastrol, pristimerin, tingenone and iguesterin (isolated from Tripterygium regelii), tannic acid (isolated from Camellia sinensis), and theaflavin-3,3'-digallate, 3-isotheaflav1in-3 gallate and dihydrotanshinone I (isolated from Salvia miltiorrhiza), had IC50 values of less than 15 µg/mL. Kinetic mechanistic studies of several active compounds revealed that their mode of inhibition was dose-dependent and competitive, with Ki values ranging from 2.4-43.8 μmol/L. Given the significance of plant-based compounds and the many promising results obtained, there is still need to explore the phytochemical and mechanistic potentials of plants and their products. These medicinal plants could serve as an effective inexpensive nutraceutical for the general public to help manage COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus 3C proteases; Drug development; Medicinal plants; Plant-derived compounds; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2022 PMID: 35985974 PMCID: PMC9359926 DOI: 10.1016/j.joim.2022.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Integr Med
Bioactivity of plant extracts and their chemical constituents against SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease.
| Plant/family | Part | Extract | Bioactive compound | Class | Dose | IC50 | Inhibition type/ | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Ethanol | Xanthoangelol E | Chalcones | 0, 12.5, 25, 50 μmol/L | 11.4 μmol/L | Competitive (11.4 μmol/L) | ||
| Xanthoangelol B | 22.2 μmol/L | Competitive (22.2 μmol/L) | ||||||
| Leaves | Aqueous | Theaflavin-3,3′-digallate | Polyphenol | No data | 9.5 μmol/L | No data | ||
| 3-Isotheaflavin-3 gallate | 7 μmol/L | |||||||
| Tannic acid | 3 μmol/L | |||||||
| Seeds | No data | No data | 0–10 µg/mL | 8.43 µg/mL | No data | |||
| Heartwood | Ethyl acetate | Savinin | Polyphenol | 0.1–10 μmol/L | 25 µg/mL | Competitive (9.1 μmol/L) | ||
| Rhizome | Methanol | No data | No data | 25–200 μg/mL | 39 μg/mL | No data | ||
| Ethanol and methanol | 0–10 µg/mL | 8.42 µg/mL | ||||||
| Tuber | Methanol | No data | No data | 25–200 μg/mL | 44 μg/mL | No data | ||
| 0–10 µg/mL | 8.03 µg/mL | |||||||
| Whole plant | Ethanol | Dieckols 1 and 2 | Polyphenol | 0–200 μmol/L | 2.7 and 68.1 μmol/L | Competitive (2.4 μmol/L) | ||
| Whole plant | Aqueous | No data | No data | 200 µg/mL | No data | No data | ||
| Roots | Aqueous | Sinigrin | Glycoside | No data | 217 μmol/L | No data | ||
| Aloeemodin | Anthraquinone | 366 μmol/L | ||||||
| Hesperetin | Flavanone | 8.3 μmol/L | ||||||
| Seeds | No data | No data | Flavonoids | 0–100 mg/L | 40.35 mg/L | No data | ||
| Stem cortex | Ethanol | Lycorine | Alkaloid | 886.6 μg/mL | 15.7 nmol/L | No data | ||
| Whole plant | Ethanol | No data | No data | No data | 13.76 µg/mL | No data | ||
| Roots | Dihydrotanshinone I | Diterpenoid | 0–200 μmol/L | 14.4 μmol/L | Noncompetitive | |||
| Leaves | Ethanol | Amentoflavone | Biflavonoid | 0–300 μmol/L | 8.3 μmol/L | Noncompetitive (13.8 μmol/L) | ||
| Bilobetin | 72.3 μmol/L | Noncompetitive (80.4 μmol/L) | ||||||
| Ginkgetin | 32.0 μmol/L | Noncompetitive (30.2 μmol/L) | ||||||
| Sciadopitysin | 38.4 μmol/L | Noncompetitive (35.6 μmol/L) | ||||||
| Bark | Chloroform | Celastrol | Triterpenes | 0–300 μmol/L | 10.3 μmol/L | Competitive (4.2 μmol/L) | ||
| Pristimerin | 5.5 μmol/L | Competitive (3.1 μmol/L) | ||||||
| Tingenone | 9.9 μmol/L | Competitive (4.0 μmol/L) | ||||||
| Iguesterin | 2.6 μmol/L | Competitive (0.8 μmol/L) |
SARS-CoV-2 3CL: virally encoded chymotrypsin-like protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; IC50: 50% inhibitory concentration.
Fig. 1Chemical structure of polyphenol and flavonoid compounds reported to inhibit 3CL protease. A–D: polyphenols, including dieckol (A), theaflavin-3,3′-digallate (B), 3-isotheaflavin-3 gallate (C) and tannic acid (D). E–K: flavonoids, including xanthoangelol E (E), xanthoangelol B (F), hesperetin (G), amentoflavone (H), bilobetin (I), ginkgetin (J) and sciadopitysin (K).
Fig. 2Chemical structure of triterpene and diterpenoid compounds reported to inhibit 3CL protease. A and B: triterpenes, including dihydrotanshinone I (A) and celastrol (B). C–E: diterpenoids, including tingenone (C), pristimerin (D) and iguesterin (E).
Fig. 3Chemical structure of alkaloids and anthraquinones reported to inhibit 3CL protease. Lycorine (A) is an alkaloid. Aloe emodin (B) and savinin (C) are anthraquinones.
Fig. 4Possible action pathways of plant compounds against SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease. ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; 3CLpro: virally encoded chymotrypsin-like protease; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.