Literature DB >> 32306047

Antibody Detection and Dynamic Characteristics in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Fei Xiang1, Xiaorong Wang1, Xinliang He1, Zhenghong Peng2, Bohan Yang1, Jianchu Zhang1, Qiong Zhou1, Hong Ye3, Yanling Ma1, Hui Li1, Xiaoshan Wei1, Pengcheng Cai4, Wan-Li Ma1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been rapidly spreading nationwide and abroad. A serologic test to identify antibody dynamics and response to SARS-CoV-2 was developed.
METHODS: The antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on the recombinant nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 at 3-40 days after symptom onset. The gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis was nucleic acid testing for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). The serodiagnostic power of the specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was investigated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and consistency rate.
RESULTS: The seroconversion of specific IgM and IgG antibodies were observed as early as the fourth day after symptom onset. In the patients with confirmed COVID-19, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and consistency rate of IgM were 77.3% (51/66), 100%, 100%, 80.0%, and 88.1%, respectively, and those of IgG were 83.3% (55/66), 95.0%, 94.8%, 83.8%, and 88.9%. In patients with suspected COVID-19, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and consistency rate of IgM were 87.5% (21/24), 100%, 100%, 95.2%, and 96.4%, respectively, and those of IgG were 70.8% (17/24), 96.6%, 85.0%, 89.1%, and 88.1%. Both antibodies performed well in serodiagnosis for COVID-19 and rely on great specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: The antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in the middle and later stages of the illness. Antibody detection may play an important role in the diagnosis of COVID-19 as a complementary approach to viral nucleic acid assays.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; ELISA; SARS-CoV-2; diagnosis; serological test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32306047      PMCID: PMC7188146          DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  214 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidic-based approaches for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Authors:  Hsuan-Yu Mu; Yu-Lun Lu; Tzu-Hung Hsiao; Jen-Huang Huang
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Clinical value analysis of IgM and IgG antibodies detected by nucleic acid in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Tao Ding; Nengping Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Structures of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and their perspectives for drug design.

Authors:  Ya Peng; Ning Du; Yuqing Lei; Sonam Dorje; Jianxun Qi; Tingrong Luo; George F Gao; Hao Song
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  Biological characteristics and biomarkers of novel SARS-CoV-2 facilitated rapid development and implementation of diagnostic tools and surveillance measures.

Authors:  Gajanan Sampatrao Ghodake; Surendra Krushna Shinde; Avinash Ashok Kadam; Rijuta Ganesh Saratale; Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale; Asad Syed; Abdallah M Elgorban; Najat Marraiki; Dae-Young Kim
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Correlation of the ratio of IgM/IgG concentration to days after symptom onset (IgM/T or IgG/T) with disease severity and outcome in non-critical COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Yan Rong; Fei Wang; Xiaoli Li; Xinhua Liang; Yang Zhou; Dandan Zhang; Jing Liu; Huadong Zeng; Jing Wang; Yi Shi
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Portable Tools for COVID-19 Point-of-Care Detection: A Review.

Authors:  Elga F Saki; Samuel A Setiawan; Dedy H B Wicaksono
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.301

7.  Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody in Echocardiography and Stress Laboratory.

Authors:  Renuka Jain; Stacie Kroboth; Denise Ignatowski; Bijoy K Khandheria
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2021-04-19

Review 8.  Tools and Techniques for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)/COVID-19 Detection.

Authors:  Seyed Hamid Safiabadi Tali; Jason J LeBlanc; Zubi Sadiq; Oyejide Damilola Oyewunmi; Carolina Camargo; Bahareh Nikpour; Narges Armanfard; Selena M Sagan; Sana Jahanshahi-Anbuhi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 9.  Animal Models of COVID-19 II. Comparative Immunology.

Authors:  Rebecca T Veenhuis; Caroline J Zeiss
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 1.521

Review 10.  [COVID-19 diagnostic tests: importance of the clinical context].

Authors:  Marc Vila Muntadas; Inés Agustí Sunyer; Alvar Agustí Garcia-Navarro
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.