| Literature DB >> 20167482 |
Young Bae Ryu1, Su-Jin Park, Young Min Kim, Ju-Yeon Lee, Woo Duck Seo, Jong Sun Chang, Ki Hun Park, Mun-Chual Rho, Woo Song Lee.
Abstract
Quinone-methide triterpenes, celastrol (1), pristimerin (2), tingenone (3), and iguesterin (4) were isolated from Triterygium regelii and dihydrocelastrol (5) was synthesized by hydrogenation under palladium catalyst. Isolated quinone-methide triterpenes (1-4) and 5 were evaluated for SARS-CoV 3CL(pro) inhibitory activities and showed potent inhibitory activities with IC(50) values of 10.3, 5.5, 9.9, and 2.6 microM, respectively, whereas the corresponding 5 having phenol moiety was observed in low activity (IC(50)=21.7 microM). As a result, quinone-methide moiety in A-ring and more hydrophobic E-ring assist to exhibit potent activity. Also, all quinone-methide triterpenes 1-4 have proven to be competitive by the kinetic analysis. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20167482 PMCID: PMC7127101 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.01.152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett ISSN: 0960-894X Impact factor: 2.823
Figure 1Chemical structures of isolated quinone-methide triterpenes (1–4) from T. regelii.
Inhibitory effects of 1–5 on SARS-CoV 3CLpro
| Entry | IC50 | Inhibition type ( |
|---|---|---|
| 10.3 ± 0.2 | Competitive (4.2 ± 0.6) | |
| 5.5 ± 0.7 | Competitive (3.1 ± 0.0) | |
| 9.9 ± 0.1 | Competitive (4.0 ± 0.1) | |
| 2.6 ± 0.3 | Competitive (0.8 ± 0.2) | |
| 21.7 ± 1.9 | Not tested | |
| Curcumin | 23.5 ± 3.7 | Not tested |
All compounds were examined in a set of experiments repeated three times; IC50 values of compounds represent the concentration that caused 50% enzyme activity loss.
Curcumin was used as a positive control.
Figure 2(A) Time course of hydrolysis of substrate by SARS-CoV 3CLpro in the presence of compounds 1–5 at 10 μM. Concentrations of compounds for lines from top to bottom were control (●), 5 (△), 1 (□), 3 (○), 2 (▾), and 4 (■), respectively. (B) Effects of compounds 1–5 on the activity of SARS-CoV 3CLpro.
Scheme 1Reagents and conditions: 10% Pd/C, EtOH, H2 gas, AcOH (cat.), rt.
Figure 3(A) Lineweaver–Burk plot for 3CLpro inhibition by compound 4. (B) Dixon plot for compound 4 determining the inhibition constant Ki.
Figure 4Computer modeling of compounds 4 (A) and 5 (B) binding to SARS-CoV 3CLpro (1uk4).
The calculated binding energy values of 1–5 on SARS-CoV 3CLpro
| Entry | Docking energy (kcal/mol) |
|---|---|
| −9.58 | |
| −9.87 | |
| −9.75 | |
| −9.97 | |
| −9.18 |