Literature DB >> 15358550

Evaluation of metal-conjugated compounds as inhibitors of 3CL protease of SARS-CoV.

John T-A Hsu1, Chih-Jung Kuo, Hsing-Pang Hsieh, Yeau-Ching Wang, Kuo-Kuei Huang, Coney P-C Lin, Ping-Fang Huang, Xin Chen, Po-Huang Liang.   

Abstract

3C-like (3CL) protease is essential for the life cycle of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and therefore represents a key anti-viral target. A compound library consisting of 960 commercially available drugs and biologically active substances was screened for inhibition of SARS-CoV 3CL protease. Potent inhibition was achieved using the mercury-containing compounds thimerosal and phenylmercuric acetate, as well as hexachlorophene. As well, 1-10 microM of each compound inhibited viral replication in Vero E6 cell culture. Detailed mechanism studies using a fluorescence-based protease assay demonstrated that the three compounds acted as competitive inhibitors (Ki=0.7, 2.4, and 13.7 microM for phenylmercuric acetate, thimerosal, and hexachlorophene, respectively). A panel of metal ions including Zn2+ and its conjugates were then evaluated for their anti-3CL protease activities. Inhibition was more pronounced using a zinc-conjugated compound (1-hydroxypyridine-2-thione zinc; Ki=0.17 microM) than using the ion alone (Ki=1.1 microM).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15358550      PMCID: PMC7134601          DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS Lett        ISSN: 0014-5793            Impact factor:   4.124


Introduction

Beginning in Guangdon province of China in late 2002, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by a novel human coronavirus (CoV) subsequently spread to over 25 countries [1, 2, 3, 4]. Subsequent analysis of the virus has revealed features that may be used in preventative or therapeutic strategies. Analogous to the 3C proteases encoded by picornaviruses, a virally encoded 3C‐like (3CL) protease that functions in the maturation of viral polyproteins is essential for the completion of the SARS‐CoV life cycle [5]. It is a chymotrypsin‐like protease that uses a Cys rather than a Ser residue as the nucleophile in the active site. The 3CL protease contains an additional helical C‐terminal domain of about 100 residues, absent from the analogous picornavirus 3C and chymotrypsin, which is essential for enzymatic activity. Its removal obviates proteolytic activity, since this critical domain is responsible for the dimerization of the protease, which is a prerequisite for proteolytic activity [6]. Moreover, the active site of the SARS‐CoV 3CL protease comprises a catalytic dyad rather than a triad. The SARS‐CoV 3CL protease represents an obvious and key target for anti‐SARS strategies. Crystallization of the protease [7, 8] has led to the identification of several candidate inhibitors in computer modeling studies [9, 10] and biological assays [11]. However, to date, a detailed exploration of inhibitor activity has been lacking. Previously, we developed a fluorescence‐based assay suitable to screen inhibitors of the protease in a high throughput format [12, 13]. We used this system presently to screen a compound library consisting of 960 mostly commercially available drugs and biologically active substances. In light of previous reports, we were interested in examining the influence of metal‐conjugated compounds on protease activity [14, 15, 16]. As reported in this paper, several compounds inhibit SARS‐CoV 3CL protease including Zn‐conjugated compounds.

Materials and methods

Materials

A fluorogenic peptide substrate (Dabcyl‐KTSAVLQSGFRKME‐Edans) and SARS‐CoV 3CL protease were prepared as previously reported [12]. The protease was stored in the buffer containing 12 mM TrisHCl (pH 7.5), 120 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 7.5 mM β‐ME, and 1 mM DTT at −70 °C before use. The compound library was obtained from The Genesis Plus Collection (MicroSource Discovery Systems, Inc., Gaylordsville, CT). Many of the 960 compounds collected in this library are compounds approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Western immunoblotting analysis

The ability of the tested compounds to inhibit SARS‐CoV replication was assayed using Vero E6 cells. Cells were infected with SARS‐CoV in the presence or absence of the particular test compound and incubated for two days at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. After two days, cells were harvested and lysed. Equal amounts (10 μl) of cell lysate were boiled in a sample loading buffer (125 mM TrisHCl, pH 6.8, 100 mM DTT, 2% SDS, 20% glycerol, and 0.005% bromophenol blue) for 5 min and then loaded onto an 8% SDSpolyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred onto a Hybond‐C extra membrane using a semidry apparatus (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). The membranes were blocked with Blotto/Tween blocking buffer (5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 77 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, 2.5% skimmed milk, and 0.001% antiform A) and then incubated with BALB/c anti‐rS268, which is an anti‐spike polyclonal antibody [17]. The membrane was then washed with blocking buffer and further incubated with goat anti‐mouse HRP‐conjugated secondary antibody. The membrane was finally washed with blocking buffer and developed with ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagent (Amersham Biosciences).

Cytotoxicity assay

Cell viability was determined by the tetrazolium salts (MTS) assay that was conducted essentially as described [18]. This convenient method is based on the conversion of MTS to a chromatic, soluble formazan in living cells, via the mitochondrial enzyme NAD‐dependent dehydrogenase. MTS and phenazine methosulfate were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) or Promega (Madison, WI) as powders and were prepared in Dulbecco's phosphate‐buffered saline. Measurements at each drug concentration were performed with three repeats.

Inhibitor assay

The enhanced fluorescence due to proteolytically catalyzed cleavage of Dabcyl‐KTSAVLQSGFRKME‐Edans was monitored at 538 nm with excitation at 355 nm using a fluorescence plate reader (Fluoroskan Ascent; ThermoLabsystems, Helsinki, FINLAND). Substrate concentration was determined from the extinction coefficient of 5438 M−1 cm−1 at 336 nm (Edans) or 15 100 M−1 cm−1 at 472 nm (Dabcyl). The fluorimetric assay was utilized to identify inhibitors of SARS‐CoV 3CL protease and determine their inhibition constants. K i measurements were performed at two fixed inhibitor concentrations of 2 and 5 μM or 3 and 5 μM. Substrate concentrations ranged from 8 to 80 μM in a reaction mixture containing 50 nM SARS‐CoV protease. Lineweaver‐Burk plots of kinetic data were fitted with the computer program KinetAsyst II (IntelliKinetics, State College, PA) by non‐linear regression to obtain the K i value for competitive and non‐competitive inhibitor using Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively. In these equations, K m is Michaelis constant of the substrate, K i is inhibition constant, V m is maximal velocity, and [I] and [S] represent the inhibitor and substrate concentrations in the reaction mixture, respectively.

Results

Influence of 3CL protease inhibitors

The compound library containing 960 compounds was screened for inhibition of the SARS‐CoV 3CL protease. Inhibition resulted from the application of the three hits, phenylmercuric acetate, thimerosal, and hexachlorophene. The influence of these compounds on viral protein production, as an indicator of replication, was then examined. As shown, Western blots revealed that 10 μM phenylmercuric acetate suppressed detection of the viral spike protein (Fig. 1 ). The actin level in Vero E6 cells treated with phenylmercuric acetate and then infected by SARS‐CoV was lower, indicating that at a concentration of 10 μM the compound might be toxic to the cells. The presence of 1 μM thimerosal diminished the detectable quantity of the spike protein by over 90 percent (Fig. 1). Similar observations were obtained using 10 μM hexachlorophene (Fig. 1). The latter two compounds displayed no apparent toxic effect, as evidenced by the unchanged actin levels. This hexachlorophene concentration also showed strong inhibition of cytopathic effect on virus‐infected Vero E6 cells (results not shown). No cytotoxicity was exhibited when Vero E6 cells were treated with 10 μM hexachlorophene (Fig. 2 ).
Figure 1

Western blot analysis of the anti‐SARS‐CoV activity of three tested inhibitors. The inhibition of SARS‐CoV replication by the compounds is demonstrated by blocking the spike protein biosynthesis by the inhibitor. Actin serves as an indicator for cytotoxicity of the compounds. Phenylmercuric acetate is toxic to the Vero cells at the concentration of 10 μM but the other two compounds are not toxic at the concentrations tested. These inhibitors apparently work well in inhibiting the viral replication in the window of 1–10 μM.

Figure 2

The cytotoxicity assay. Hexachlorophene was found to possess potent anti‐SARS‐CoV activity at a concentration that did not cause cellular toxicity. The cellular toxicity evaluated by MTS assay reveals that with 100 μM hexachlorophene, approximately 50% of the Vero E6 cells are still alive.

Western blot analysis of the anti‐SARS‐CoV activity of three tested inhibitors. The inhibition of SARS‐CoV replication by the compounds is demonstrated by blocking the spike protein biosynthesis by the inhibitor. Actin serves as an indicator for cytotoxicity of the compounds. Phenylmercuric acetate is toxic to the Vero cells at the concentration of 10 μM but the other two compounds are not toxic at the concentrations tested. These inhibitors apparently work well in inhibiting the viral replication in the window of 1–10 μM. The cytotoxicity assay. Hexachlorophene was found to possess potent anti‐SARS‐CoV activity at a concentration that did not cause cellular toxicity. The cellular toxicity evaluated by MTS assay reveals that with 100 μM hexachlorophene, approximately 50% of the Vero E6 cells are still alive.

Inhibitor assay using a fluorogenic substrate

Determination of the K i values of phenylmercuric acetate, thimerosal, and hexachlorophene against 3CL protease indicated that these compounds were competitive inhibitors with K i values of 0.7 μM (phenylmercuric acetate), 2.4 μM (thimerosal), and 13.7 μM (hexachlorophene). Since mercury‐containing compounds such as phenylmercuric acetate and thimerosal may pose therapeutic hazards to a patient, we further evaluated a series of metal‐containing compounds (Table 1 ) and metal ions (Table 2 ). Paramount among these was a Zn‐conjugated compound.
Table Table 1

K i values and the structures of some inhibiotrs of SARS‐CoV 3CL protease

Inhibitor K i (μM)
Phenylmercuric acetate a 0.7 ± 0.3
Thimerosal a 2.4 ± 0.2
Hexachlorophene a 13.7 ± 0.4
Phenylmercuric nitrate 0.3 ± 0.3
1‐Hydroxypyridine‐2‐thione zinc 0.17 ± 0.07
N‐Ethyl‐N‐phenyldithiocarbamic acid zinc 1.0 ± 0.1
Toluene‐3,4‐dithiolato zinc 1.4 ± 0.2

Hits from 960‐compound library.

Table Table 2

K i values of three metal ions in inhibiting the SARS‐CoV 3CL protease

Metal ion K i (μM)
Hg2+ 0.5 ± 0.1
Zn2+ 1.1 ± 0.4
Cu2+ 4.9 ± 1.3
K i values and the structures of some inhibiotrs of SARS‐CoV 3CL protease Hits from 960‐compound library. K i values of three metal ions in inhibiting the SARS‐CoV 3CL protease As shown in Fig. 3 , 1‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐thione zinc was a competitive inhibitor with a K i value of 0.17 μM. In contrast, Zn2+ acted non‐competitively against SARS‐CoV protease, with a 6‐fold larger K i value of 1.1 μM (Fig. 4 ). The indicated involvement of the organic moiety of the compound in inhibitory activity was supported by observations that N‐ethyl‐N‐phenyldithiocarbamic acid zinc and toluene‐3,4‐dithiolato zinc showed similar K i values (1.0 and 1.4 μM, respectively) to that of the Zn2+ (1.1 μM), whereas 1‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐thione zinc had a markedly smaller K i of 0.17 μM.
Figure 3

The K i measurements of a selected SARS protease inhibitor 1‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐thione zinc. The enzyme activities were measured using 8–80 μM fluorogenic substrate in the absence (∘) or presence of 2 (▴) and 5 μM (■) inhibitor. The data were fitted with Eq. (1) using KinetAsyst II program to obtain the K i value (0.17 μM). The inhibition pattern indicates that 1‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐thione zinc is competitive with respect to the substrate.

Figure 4

The K i measurements for zinc ion. The reaction velocities of SARS 3CL protease in the absence (∘) or presence of 3 (▴) and 5 μM (■) Zn2+ and various substrate concentrations ranged from 8 to 80 μM were used to determine the K i value (1.1 μM) of Zn2+ by fitting the data with Eq. (2) using KinetAsyst II program. The inhibition pattern indicates that zinc ion is non‐competitive with respect to the substrate.

The K i measurements of a selected SARS protease inhibitor 1‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐thione zinc. The enzyme activities were measured using 8–80 μM fluorogenic substrate in the absence (∘) or presence of 2 (▴) and 5 μM (■) inhibitor. The data were fitted with Eq. (1) using KinetAsyst II program to obtain the K i value (0.17 μM). The inhibition pattern indicates that 1‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐thione zinc is competitive with respect to the substrate. The K i measurements for zinc ion. The reaction velocities of SARS 3CL protease in the absence (∘) or presence of 3 (▴) and 5 μM (■) Zn2+ and various substrate concentrations ranged from 8 to 80 μM were used to determine the K i value (1.1 μM) of Zn2+ by fitting the data with Eq. (2) using KinetAsyst II program. The inhibition pattern indicates that zinc ion is non‐competitive with respect to the substrate.

Activity of niclosamide

Niclosamide, which is used in the treatment of parasitic disorders, shows promise as an inhibitor of SARS‐CoV replication [19]. It was then suggested to be a SARS‐CoV protease inhibitor on the basis of computer modeling [9]. However, presently, fluorimetric assay results were not indicative of any inhibitory effect of niclosamide against the protease (data not shown).

Discussion

In the present study, 960 commerically available drugs and biologically active substances, as well as metal‐conjugated compounds, were tested for their ability to functionally disrupt SARS‐CoV protease activity. The 3CL protease we prepared is dimeric in its functional form and is more active than the previously prepared 3CL protease [5, 11], by virtue of the absence of extra amino acids at the N‐ and C‐termini. Not only did the present study involve a more potent enzyme, but the enzyme activity was assessed in real‐time using a fluorogenic substrate [12]. These examinations have identified protease inhibition by some of the compounds tested. These effective compounds also suppress viral replication, correlative with their anti‐SARS‐CoV protease activity. Two of these compounds, phenylmercuric acetate and thimerosal, are used as pharmaceutical excipients, and are widely used as antimicrobial preservatives in parenteral and topical pharmaceutical formulations [20]. In particular, phenylmercuric acetate is used as an antimocrobial preservative in cosmetics, as a bactericide in parenterals and eye‐drops, and as a spermicide. Another effective compound, hexachlorophene, is an antibacterial compound that is a common constituent of soaps and scrubs and is experimentally used as a cholinesterase inhibitor. In addition to the anti‐viral activity of these commercially available compounds, several metallic species displayed potential against the SARS‐CoV protease. Several metal ions inhibit Cys protease via the interaction with a nucleophilic sulfur anion [14]. SARS‐CoV 3CL protease is also a Cys protease. Presently, seven transition metal ions were tested. While Hg2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ were effective, Co2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and Ni2+ did not inhibit 3CL protease activity. These metal ions are non‐competitive inhibitors by virtue of their size. They are too small to block substrate binding, despite being capable of interaction with the active site Cys residue. Phenylmercuric acetate and phenylmercuric nitrate are similar to Hg2+ in their inhibitory power. However, the observed markedly higher affinity of 1‐hydroxypyridine‐2‐thione zinc for the protease, compared to Zn2+, is consistent with the suggestion that the former is a more specific 3CL inhibitor. It is noteworthy that Zn‐containing compounds such as zinc acetate are added as a supplement to the drug for the treatment of Wilson's disease [21], indicating the safety of the ion for human use. More relevantly, zinc salts such as zincum gluconicum (Zenullose) may be effective in treating the common cold, a disease caused by rhinoviruses, without knowledge of the molecular target [22]. Thus, the present documentation of the anti‐SARS, sub‐micromolar K i action of Zn‐conjugated compounds provides a firm foundation on which to embark upon SARS therapeutic drug explorations.
  22 in total

1.  Treatment of Wilson's disease with zinc. XVII: treatment during pregnancy.

Authors:  G J Brewer; V D Johnson; R D Dick; P Hedera; J K Fink; K J Kluin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Identification of novel inhibitors of the SARS coronavirus main protease 3CLpro.

Authors:  Usman Bacha; Jennifer Barrila; Adrian Velazquez-Campoy; Stephanie A Leavitt; Ernesto Freire
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas G Ksiazek; Dean Erdman; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Sherif R Zaki; Teresa Peret; Shannon Emery; Suxiang Tong; Carlo Urbani; James A Comer; Wilina Lim; Pierre E Rollin; Scott F Dowell; Ai-Ee Ling; Charles D Humphrey; Wun-Ju Shieh; Jeannette Guarner; Christopher D Paddock; Paul Rota; Barry Fields; Joseph DeRisi; Jyh-Yuan Yang; Nancy Cox; James M Hughes; James W LeDuc; William J Bellini; Larry J Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Use of an aqueous soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth assays in culture.

Authors:  A H Cory; T C Owen; J A Barltrop; J G Cory
Journal:  Cancer Commun       Date:  1991-07

5.  Evaluation of metal-conjugated compounds as inhibitors of 3CL protease of SARS-CoV.

Authors:  John T-A Hsu; Chih-Jung Kuo; Hsing-Pang Hsieh; Yeau-Ching Wang; Kuo-Kuei Huang; Coney P-C Lin; Ping-Fang Huang; Xin Chen; Po-Huang Liang
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Structure of coronavirus main proteinase reveals combination of a chymotrypsin fold with an extra alpha-helical domain.

Authors:  Kanchan Anand; Gottfried J Palm; Jeroen R Mesters; Stuart G Siddell; John Ziebuhr; Rolf Hilgenfeld
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Old drugs as lead compounds for a new disease? Binding analysis of SARS coronavirus main proteinase with HIV, psychotic and parasite drugs.

Authors:  Xue Wu Zhang; Yee Leng Yap
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Identifying inhibitors of the SARS coronavirus proteinase.

Authors:  Ekachai Jenwitheesuk; Ram Samudrala
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Aetiology: Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus.

Authors:  Ron A M Fouchier; Thijs Kuiken; Martin Schutten; Geert van Amerongen; Gerard J J van Doornum; Bernadette G van den Hoogen; Malik Peiris; Wilina Lim; Klaus Stöhr; Albert D M E Osterhaus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Biosynthesis, purification, and substrate specificity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 3C-like proteinase.

Authors:  Keqiang Fan; Ping Wei; Qian Feng; Sidi Chen; Changkang Huang; Liang Ma; Bing Lai; Jianfeng Pei; Ying Liu; Jianguo Chen; Luhua Lai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  44 in total

1.  Quantitative proteomics using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture reveals changes in the cytoplasmic, nuclear, and nucleolar proteomes in Vero cells infected with the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus.

Authors:  Edward Emmott; Mark A Rodgers; Andrew Macdonald; Sarah McCrory; Paul Ajuh; Julian A Hiscox
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Screening of an FDA-approved compound library identifies four small-molecule inhibitors of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication in cell culture.

Authors:  Adriaan H de Wilde; Dirk Jochmans; Clara C Posthuma; Jessika C Zevenhoven-Dobbe; Stefan van Nieuwkoop; Theo M Bestebroer; Bernadette G van den Hoogen; Johan Neyts; Eric J Snijder
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Perspectives on SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors.

Authors:  Kaifu Gao; Rui Wang; Jiahui Chen; Jetze J Tepe; Faqing Huang; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 8.039

4.  X-ray screening identifies active site and allosteric inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease.

Authors:  Sebastian Günther; Patrick Y A Reinke; Yaiza Fernández-García; Julia Lieske; Thomas J Lane; Helen M Ginn; Faisal H M Koua; Christiane Ehrt; Wiebke Ewert; Dominik Oberthuer; Oleksandr Yefanov; Susanne Meier; Kristina Lorenzen; Boris Krichel; Janine-Denise Kopicki; Luca Gelisio; Wolfgang Brehm; Ilona Dunkel; Brandon Seychell; Henry Gieseler; Brenna Norton-Baker; Beatriz Escudero-Pérez; Martin Domaracky; Sofiane Saouane; Alexandra Tolstikova; Thomas A White; Anna Hänle; Michael Groessler; Holger Fleckenstein; Fabian Trost; Marina Galchenkova; Yaroslav Gevorkov; Chufeng Li; Salah Awel; Ariana Peck; Miriam Barthelmess; Frank Schlünzen; P Lourdu Xavier; Nadine Werner; Hina Andaleeb; Najeeb Ullah; Sven Falke; Vasundara Srinivasan; Bruno Alves França; Martin Schwinzer; Hévila Brognaro; Cromarte Rogers; Diogo Melo; Joanna J Zaitseva-Doyle; Juraj Knoska; Gisel E Peña-Murillo; Aida Rahmani Mashhour; Vincent Hennicke; Pontus Fischer; Johanna Hakanpää; Jan Meyer; Philip Gribbon; Bernhard Ellinger; Maria Kuzikov; Markus Wolf; Andrea R Beccari; Gleb Bourenkov; David von Stetten; Guillaume Pompidor; Isabel Bento; Saravanan Panneerselvam; Ivars Karpics; Thomas R Schneider; Maria Marta Garcia-Alai; Stephan Niebling; Christian Günther; Christina Schmidt; Robin Schubert; Huijong Han; Juliane Boger; Diana C F Monteiro; Linlin Zhang; Xinyuanyuan Sun; Jonathan Pletzer-Zelgert; Jan Wollenhaupt; Christian G Feiler; Manfred S Weiss; Eike-Christian Schulz; Pedram Mehrabi; Katarina Karničar; Aleksandra Usenik; Jure Loboda; Henning Tidow; Ashwin Chari; Rolf Hilgenfeld; Charlotte Uetrecht; Russell Cox; Andrea Zaliani; Tobias Beck; Matthias Rarey; Stephan Günther; Dusan Turk; Winfried Hinrichs; Henry N Chapman; Arwen R Pearson; Christian Betzel; Alke Meents
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Structural basis of inhibition specificities of 3C and 3C-like proteases by zinc-coordinating and peptidomimetic compounds.

Authors:  Cheng-Chung Lee; Chih-Jung Kuo; Tzu-Ping Ko; Min-Feng Hsu; Yao-Chen Tsui; Shih-Cheng Chang; Syaulan Yang; Shu-Jen Chen; Hua-Chien Chen; Ming-Chu Hsu; Shin-Ru Shih; Po-Huang Liang; Andrew H-J Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Progress in Anti-SARS Coronavirus Chemistry, Biology and Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arun K Ghosh; Kai Xi; Michael E Johnson; Susan C Baker; Andrew D Mesecar
Journal:  Annu Rep Med Chem       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 7.  Use of nanotechnology in combating coronavirus.

Authors:  Saee Gharpure; Balaprasad Ankamwar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 8.  Synthetic and computational efforts towards the development of peptidomimetics and small-molecule SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibitors.

Authors:  Abhik Paul; Arnab Sarkar; Sanjukta Saha; Avik Maji; Pritha Janah; Tapan Kumar Maity
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Hexachlorophene is a potent KCNQ1/KCNE1 potassium channel activator which rescues LQTs mutants.

Authors:  Yueming Zheng; Xuejing Zhu; Pingzheng Zhou; Xi Lan; Haiyan Xu; Min Li; Zhaobing Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Antiviral drugs specific for coronaviruses in preclinical development.

Authors:  Adeyemi O Adedeji; Stefan G Sarafianos
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 7.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.